- Open Access
Contextual Heisenberg microscope
Phys. Rev. A 113, 042215 – Published 16 April, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/nl5q-n9qf
Abstract
The Heisenberg microscope provides a powerful mental image of the measurement process of quantum mechanics (QM), attempting to explain the uncertainty relation through an uncontrollable backaction from the measurement device. However, Heisenberg's proposed backaction uses features that are not present in the QM description of the world, and according to Bohr not present in the world. Therefore, Bohr argues, the mental image proposed by Heisenberg should be avoided. Later developments by Bell and Kochen-Specker show that a model that contains the features used for the Heisenberg microscope is in principle possible but must necessarily be nonlocal and contextual. In this paper we will reexamine the measurement process within a restriction of QM known as Stabilizer QM (SQM), that still exhibits, for example, Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger nonlocality and Peres-Mermin contextuality. The reexamination will use a recent extension of SQM, the Contextual Ontological Model (COM), where the system state gives a complete description of future measurement outcomes reproducing the quantum predictions, including the mentioned phenomena. We will see that the resulting contextual Heisenberg microscope backaction can be completely described within COM, and that the associated randomness originates in the initial state of the pointer system, exactly as in the original description of the Heisenberg microscope. The presence of contextuality, usually seen as prohibiting ontological models, suggests that the contextual Heisenberg microscope picture could perhaps be enabled in general QM.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (27)
- W. Heisenberg, Über den anschaulichen inhalt der quantentheoretischen kinematik und mechanik, Z. Phys. 43, 172 (1927), English translation in [2].
- W. Heisenberg, The physical content of quantum kinematics and mechanics, in Quantum Theory and Measurement, edited by J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1983), p. 62.
- A. H. Compton, A quantum theory of the scattering of x-rays by light elements, Phys. Rev. 21, 483 (1923).
- W. Heisenberg, The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory (Dover, New York, 1930).
- E. H. Kennard, Zur Quantenmechanik einfacher Bewegungstypen, Z. Phys. 44, 326 (1927).
- N. Bohr, The Quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory, Nature (London) 121, 580 (1928).
- J. S. Bell, On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox, Phys. Phys. Fiz. 1, 195 (1964).
- S. Kochen and E. P. Specker, The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics, J. Math. Mech. 17, 59 (1967).
- C. Budroni, A. Cabello, O. Gühne, M. Kleinmann, and J.-Å. Larsson, Kochen-Specker contextuality, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 045007 (2022).
- B. Hensen, H. Bernien, A. E. Dréau, A. Reiserer, N. Kalb, M. S. Blok, J. Ruitenberg, R. F. L. Vermeulen, R. N. Schouten, C. Abellán, W. Amaya, V. Pruneri, M. W. Mitchell, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, D. Elkouss, S. Wehner, T. H. Taminiau, and R. Hanson, Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres, Nature (London) 526, 682 (2015).
- M. Giustina et al., Significant-loophole-free test of Bell's theorem with entangled photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250401 (2015).
- L. K. Shalm et al., Strong loophole-free test of local realism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250402 (2015).
- M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, 10th Anniversary ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2010).
- D. Gottesman, Stabilizer codes and quantum error correction, Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, 1997, arXiv:quant-ph/9705052.
- D. Gottesman, Theory of fault-tolerant quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A 57, 127 (1998).
- D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and A. Zeilinger, Bell's theorem without inequalities, Am. J. Phys. 58, 1131 (1990).
- A. Peres, Incompatible results of quantum measurements, Phys. Lett. A 151, 107 (1990).
- N. D. Mermin, Simple unified form for the major no-hidden-variables theorems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3373 (1990).
- C. Hindlycke and J.-Å. Larsson, Efficient contextual ontological model of n-qubit stabilizer quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 130401 (2022).
- S. Aaronson and D. Gottesman, Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits, Phys. Rev. A 70, 052328 (2004).
- A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).
- N. Bohr, Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 48, 696 (1935).
- D. Gottesman, The Heisenberg representation of quantum computers, in Group22: Proceedings of the XXII International Colloquium on Group Theoretical Methods in Physics, edited by S. P. Corney, R. Delbourgo, and P. D. Jarvis (International Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999), pp. 32–43.
- J. Fankhauser, T. Gonda, and G. De les Coves, Epistemic horizons from deterministic laws: Lessons from a nomic toy theory, Synthese 205, 136 (2025).
- D. Bohm, Quantum Theory (Prentice Hall, New York, 1951).
- A. Skott, Spin measurement in Bohmian mechanics and the contextual ontological model, Master's thesis, LiTH-ISY-EX–24/5648–SE, Linköping University, Linköping, 2024.
- N. Johansson, F. Huber, and J.-Å. Larsson, Conjugate logic, in The Quantum-Like Revolution, edited by A. Plotnitsky and E. Haven (Springer, Cham, 2023), pp. 157–180, arXiv:2102.06572.
