Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Vortex detection from quantum data

Chelsea A. Williams1,2, Annie E. Paine2, Antonio A. Gentile2, Daniel Berger3, and Oleksandr Kyriienko4

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QL, United Kingdom
  • 2PASQAL, 7 Rue Léonard de Vinci, 91300 Massy, France
  • 3Siemens AG, Gleiwitzer Strasse 555, 90475 Nürnberg, Germany
  • 4School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom

Phys. Rev. A 112, 062409 – Published 5 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/mn3x-8ygh

Abstract

Quantum solutions to differential equations represent quantum data—states that contain relevant information about the system's behavior, yet are difficult to analyze. We propose an algorithm for reading out information from such data, where customized quantum circuits enable efficient extraction of flow properties. We concentrate on the process referred to as quantum vortex detection, where specialized operators are developed for pooling relevant features related to vorticity. Specifically, we propose approaches based on sliding windows and quantum Fourier analysis that provide a separation between patches of the flow field with vortex-type profiles. First, we show how contour-shaped windows can be applied, trained, and analyzed sequentially, providing a clear signal to flag the location of vortices in the flow. Second, we develop a parallel window extraction technique, such that signals from different contour positions are coherently processed to avoid looping over the entire solution mesh. We show that Fourier features can be extracted from the flow field, leading to classification of datasets with vortex-free solutions against those exhibiting Lamb-Oseen vortices. Our work exemplifies a successful case of efficiently extracting value from quantum data, and it points to the need for developing appropriate models for quantum data analysis that can be trained on them.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (129)

  1. A. N. Kolmogorov, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 434, 9 (1991).
  2. S. K. Robinson, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23, 601 (1991).
  3. J. Jiménez, A. A. Wray, P. G. Saffman, and R. S. Rogallo, J. Fluid Mech. 255, 65 (1993).
  4. J. O'Connor, P. Day, P. Mandal, and A. Revell, Integr. Biol. 8, 589 (2016).
  5. J. Anderson, Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Basics with Applications, McGraw-Hill International Editions: Mechanical Engineering (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995).
  6. A. K. M. F. Hussain, J. Fluid Mech. 173, 303 (1986).
  7. J. Jeong and F. Hussain, J. Fluid Mech. 285, 69 (1995).
  8. G. Lindner, Y. Devaux, and S. Miskovic, SoftwareX 12, 100604 (2020).
  9. K. Shibata and T. Magara, Liv. Rev. Solar Phys. 8, 6 (2011).
  10. P. Goldreich and S. Sridhar, Astrophys. J. 438, 763 (1995).
  11. M.-M. Mac Low and R. S. Klessen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 125 (2004).
  12. L.-A. Couston, D. Lecoanet, B. Favier, and M. Le Bars, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023143 (2020).
  13. J. C. McWilliams, J. Fluid Mech. 146, 21 (1984).
  14. P. R. Spalart and S. R. Allmaras, Recherche Aérospatiale 5 (1994).
  15. J. Smagorinsky, Month. Weather Rev. 91, 99 (1963).
  16. F. Sadlo, R. Peikert, and E. Parkinson, IEEE Visualization 2004 (IEEE, Texas, USA, 2004), pp. 179–186.
  17. Q. Yang, W. Li, L. Ji, W. Shi, W. Pu, Y. Long, and X. He, J. Mater. Sci. Eng. 11, 2209 (2023).
  18. L. J. Vermeer, J. N. Sørensen, and A. Crespo, Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 39, 467 (2003).
  19. M. J. Lighthill, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 211, 564 (1952).
  20. P. W. Bearman, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 16, 195 (1984).
  21. P. Moin and K. Mahesh, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 30, 539 (1998).
  22. Y. Kaneda, T. Ishihara, M. Yokokawa, K. Itakura, and A. Uno, Phys. Fluids 15, L21 (2003).
  23. M. Lee and R. D. Moser, J. Fluid Mech. 774, 395 (2015).
  24. A. W. Harrow, A. Hassidim, and S. Lloyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 150502 (2009).
  25. A. M. Dalzell, S. McArdle, M. Berta, P. Bienias, C.-F. Chen, A. Gilyén, C. T. Hann, M. J. Kastoryano, E. T. Khabiboulline, A. Kubica, G. Salton, S. Wang, and F. G. S. L. Brandão, Quantum Algorithms: A Survey of Applications and End-to- End Complexities (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2025).
  26. Y. Cao, A. Papageorgiou, I. Petras, J. Traub, and S. Kais, New J. Phys. 15, 013021 (2013).
  27. A. Montanaro and S. Pallister, Phys. Rev. A 93, 032324 (2016).
  28. T. Xin, S. Wei, J. Cui, J. Xiao, I. Arrazola, L. Lamata, X. Kong, D. Lu, E. Solano, and G. Long, Phys. Rev. A 101, 032307 (2020).
  29. A. Martin, R. Ibarrondo, and M. Sanz, Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 064056 (2023).
  30. C. A. Williams, A. E. Paine, H.-Y. Wu, V. E. Elfving, and O. Kyriienko, arXiv:2306.17026.
  31. O. Kyriienko, A. E. Paine, and V. E. Elfving, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033291 (2024).
  32. L. Lin and Y. Tong, Quantum 4, 361 (2020).
  33. N. Linden, A. Montanaro, and C. Shao, Commun. Math. Phys. 395, 601 (2022).
  34. H. Krovi, Quantum 7, 913 (2023).
  35. P. C. S. Costa, P. Schleich, M. E. S. Morales, and D. W. Berry, npj Quantum Inf. 11, 141 (2025).
  36. A. M. Childs, R. Kothari, and R. D. Somma, SIAM J. Comput. 46, 1920 (2017).
  37. A. M. Childs and N. Wiebe, Quantum Inf. Comput. 12, 901 (2012).
  38. D. W. Berry, A. M. Childs, A. Ostrander, and G. Wang, Commun. Math. Phys. 356, 1057 (2017).
  39. D. Jennings, M. Lostaglio, S. Pallister, A. T. Sornborger, and Y. Subaşı, arXiv:2305.11352.
  40. S. Gribling, I. Kerenidis, and D. Szilágyi, ACM Trans. Quantum Comput. 5, 1 (2024).
  41. S. Jin, N. Liu, and Y. Yu, Phys. Rev. A 108, 032603 (2023).
  42. S. Jin and N. Liu, Quantum Sci. Technol. 9, 035047 (2024).
  43. S. Jin and N. Liu, Proc. R. Soc. A 480, 20230370 (2024).
  44. J. Hu, S. Jin, N. Liu, and L. Zhang, Quantum 8, 1563 (2024).
  45. B. Liu, M. Ortiz, and F. Cirak, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 432, 117403 (2024).
  46. M. Lubasch, Y. Kikuchi, L. Wright, and C. M. Keever, arXiv:2505.16895.
  47. E. Devereux and A. Datta, Phys. Rev. A 112, 042419 (2025).
  48. Y. Subaşı, R. D. Somma, and D. Orsucci, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 060504 (2019).
  49. P. C. S. Costa, D. An, Y. R. Sanders, Y. Su, R. Babbush, and D. W. Berry, PRX Quantum 3, 040303 (2022).
  50. D. An and L. Lin, ACM Trans. Quantum Comput. 3, 1 (2022).
  51. C. A. Williams, A. A. Gentile, V. E. Elfving, D. Berger, and O. Kyriienko, Adv. Quantum Technol. e00618 (2025).
  52. O. M. Raisuddin and S. De, arXiv:2404.07466.
  53. P. Jaksch, arXiv:2201.04513.
  54. J.-P. Liu, H. Øie Kolden, H. K. Krovi, N. F. Loureiro, K. Trivisa, and A. M. Childs, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2026805118 (2021).
  55. Y. Tanaka, Y. Ito, and K. Fujii, Sci. Rep. 13, 4531 (2023).
  56. J. Ingelmann, S. S. Bharadwaj, P. Pfeffer, K. R. Sreenivasan, and J. Schumacher, Comput. Fluids 281, 106369 (2024).
  57. H.-C. Wu, J. Wang, and X. Li, arXiv:2405.12714.
  58. J. Gonzalez-Conde, D. Lewis, S. S. Bharadwaj, and M. Sanz, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 023254 (2025).
  59. C. Sanavio, R. Scatamacchia, C. de Falco, and S. Succi, Phys. Fluids 36, 057143 (2024).
  60. C. Sanavio, E. Mauri, and S. Succi, arXiv:2406.01118.
  61. A. E. Paine, V. E. Elfving, and O. Kyriienko, arXiv:2308.01827.
  62. H.-Y. Wu, A. E. Paine, E. Philip, A. A. Gentile, and O. Kyriienko, arXiv:2504.13174.
  63. M. Lubasch, J. Joo, P. Moinier, M. Kiffner, and D. Jaksch, Phys. Rev. A 101, 010301(R) (2020).
  64. D. Jaksch, P. Givi, A. J. Daley, and T. Rung, AIAA J. 61, 1885 (2023).
  65. A. J. Pool, A. D. Somoza, C. McKeever, M. Lubasch, and B. Horstmann, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033257 (2024).
  66. J. Biamonte, P. Wittek, N. Pancotti, P. Rebentrost, N. Wiebe, and S. Lloyd, Nature (London) 549, 195 (2017).
  67. C. A. Williams, S. Scali, A. A. Gentile, D. Berger, and O. Kyriienko, arXiv:2411.14259.
  68. J. R. Canivete Cuissa and O. Steiner, Astron. Astrophys. 668, A118 (2022).
  69. B. Epps, Review of vortex identification methods, in 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Texas, USA, 2017).
  70. S. L. Brunton, B. R. Noack, and P. Koumoutsakos, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 52, 477 (2020).
  71. K. Duraisamy, G. Iaccarino, and H. Xiao, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 51, 357 (2019).
  72. C. M. Ströfer, J.-L. Wu, H. Xiao, and E. Paterson, Commun. Comput. Phys. 25, 625 (2025).
  73. Y. Wang, D. Liang, Z. Yang, D. Zhao, and F. Wang, Visual Comput. 37, 261 (2021).
  74. L. Deng, W. Bao, Y. Wang, Z. Yang, D. Zhao, F. Wang, C. Bi, and Y. Guo, Appl. Soft Comput. 115, 108229 (2022).
  75. D. Liang, Y. Wang, Y. Liu, F. Wang, S. Li, and J. Liu, J. Visual. 22, 65 (2018).
  76. J. Wang, L. Guo, Y. Wang, L. Deng, F. Wang, and T. Li, Int. J. Aerosp. Eng. 2020, 8865001 (2020).
  77. H.-Y. Huang, M. Broughton, J. Cotler, S. Chen, J. Li, M. Mohseni, H. Neven, R. Babbush, R. Kueng, J. Preskill, and J. R. McClean, Science 376, 1182 (2022).
  78. L. Schatzki, A. Arrasmith, P. J. Coles, and M. Cerezo, arXiv:2109.03400.
  79. M. C. Caro, H.-Y. Huang, M. Cerezo, K. Sharma, A. Sornborger, L. Cincio, and P. J. Coles, Nat. Commun. 13, 4919 (2022).
  80. E. R. Anschuetz, H.-Y. Hu, J.-L. Huang, and X. Gao, PRX Quantum 4, 020338 (2023).
  81. C. Umeano, V. E. Elfving, and O. Kyriienko, arXiv:2402.03871.
  82. C. Umeano, S. Scali, and O. Kyriienko, arXiv:2409.01496.
  83. L. Lewis, D. Gilboa, and J. R. McClean, arXiv:2503.20879.
  84. Y. Morohoshi, A. Nakayama, H. Manabe, and K. Mitarai, arXiv:2504.16370.
  85. A. Barthe, M. Y. Rad, M. Grossi, and V. Dunjko, arXiv:2506.17089.
  86. O. Kyriienko, A. E. Paine, and V. E. Elfving, Phys. Rev. A 103, 052416 (2021).
  87. A. E. Paine, V. E. Elfving, and O. Kyriienko, Adv. Quantum Technol. 6, 2300065 (2023).
  88. A. E. Paine, V. E. Elfving, and O. Kyriienko, Phys. Rev. A 107, 032428 (2023).
  89. S. Markidis, Front. Appl. Math. Statist. 8, 1036711 (2022).
  90. N. Heim, A. Ghosh, O. Kyriienko, and V. E. Elfving, arXiv:2111.06376.
  91. S. Kasture, O. Kyriienko, and V. E. Elfving, Phys. Rev. A 108, 042406 (2023).
  92. A. Setty, R. Abdusalamov, and F. Motzoi, Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol. 6, 015002 (2025).
  93. B. Jaderberg, A. A. Gentile, Y. A. Berrada, E. Shishenina, and V. E. Elfving, Phys. Rev. A 109, 042421 (2024).
  94. B. Jaderberg, A. A. Gentile, A. Ghosh, V. E. Elfving, C. Jones, D. Vodola, J. Manobianco, and H. Weiss, Phys. Rev. A 110, 052423 (2024).
  95. J. J. M. de Lejarza, H.-Y. Wu, O. Kyriienko, G. Rodrigo, and M. Grossi, arXiv:2503.16073.
  96. I. Cong, S. Choi, and M. D. Lukin, Nat. Phys. 15, 1273 (2019).
  97. A. Pesah, M. Cerezo, S. Wang, T. Volkoff, A. T. Sornborger, and P. J. Coles, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041011 (2021).
  98. T. Hur, L. Kim, and D. K. Park, Quantum Mach. Intell. 4, 3 (2022).
  99. S. Y.-C. Chen, T.-C. Wei, C. Zhang, H. Yu, and S. Yoo, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013231 (2022).
  100. J. Herrmann, S. M. Llima, A. Remm, P. Zapletal, N. A. McMahon, C. Scarato, F. Swiadek, C. K. Andersen, C. Hellings, S. Krinner et al., Nat. Commun. 13, 4144 (2022).
  101. P. Zapletal, N. A. McMahon, and M. J. Hartmann, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033111 (2024).
  102. C. Umeano, A. E. Paine, V. E. Elfving, and O. Kyriienko, Adv. Quantum Technol. 8, 2400325 (2024).
  103. E. Gil-Fuster, J. Eisert, and C. Bravo-Prieto, Nat. Commun. 15, 2277 (2024).
  104. Y. Song, J. Li, Y. Wu, S. Qin, Q. Wen, and F. Gao, Front. Phys. 12, (2024).
  105. M. L. Goh, M. Larocca, L. Cincio, M. Cerezo, and F. Sauvage, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 033266 (2025).
  106. M. Cerezo, M. Larocca, D. García-Martín, N. L. Diaz, P. Braccia, E. Fontana, M. S. Rudolph, P. Bermejo, A. Ijaz, S. Thanasilp, E. R. Anschuetz, and Z. Holmes, Nat. Commun. 16, 7907 (2025).
  107. P. Bermejo, P. Braccia, M. S. Rudolph, Z. Holmes, L. Cincio, and M. Cerezo, arXiv:2408.12739.
  108. K. O'Shea and R. Nash, arXiv:1511.08458.
  109. W. J. Devenport, M. C. Rife, S. I. Liapis, and G. J. Follin, J. Fluid Mech. 312, 67 (1996).
  110. A. Ramakrishnan, in Proceedings of the Conference on Clifford Algebra, its Generalization and Applications (Matscience, Madras, 1971), pp. 87–96.
  111. C. Sünderhauf, E. Campbell, and J. Camps, Quantum 8, 1226 (2024).
  112. D. Camps, L. Lin, R. V. Beeumen, and C. Yang, arXiv:2203.10236.
  113. L. Budinski, O. Niemimäki, R. Zamora-Zamora, and V. Lahtinen, Quantum Sci. Technol. 8, 045031 (2023).
  114. V. V. Shende, A. K. Prasad, I. L. Markov, and J. P. Hayes, Trans. Comp.-Aided Des. Integ. Cir. Sys. 22, 710 (2006).
  115. S. Herbert, J. Sorci, and Y. Tang, Phys. Rev. A 110, 012437 (2024).
  116. A. Wills and S. Strelchuk, arXiv:2305.04069.
  117. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010).
  118. E. Bäumer, D. Sutter, and S. Woerner, arXiv:2504.20832.
  119. M. Oszmaniec, F. B. Maciejewski, and Z. Puchała, Phys. Rev. A 100, 012351 (2019).
  120. C. Umeano, S. Scali, and O. Kyriienko, Phys. Rev. A 112, 052422 (2025).
  121. S. Beddar-Wiesing, A. Moallemy-Oureh, M. Kempkes, and J. M. Thomas, arXiv:2507.03392.
  122. R. Lguensat, M. Sun, R. Fablet, P. Tandeo, E. Mason, and G. Chen, in IGARSS 2018-2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IEEE, Valencia, Spain, 2018), pp. 1764–1767.
  123. N. Gourianov, M. Lubasch, S. Dolgov, Q. Y. van den Berg, H. Babaee, P. Givi, M. Kiffner, and D. Jaksch, Nat. Comput. Sci. 2, 30 (2022).
  124. S. Lloyd, S. Garnerone, and P. Zanardi, Nat. Commun. 7, 10138 (2016).
  125. C. Gyurik, C. Cade, and V. Dunjko, Quantum 6, 855 (2022).
  126. D. W. Berry, Y. Su, C. Gyurik, R. King, J. Basso, A. D. T. Barba, A. Rajput, N. Wiebe, V. Dunjko, and R. Babbush, PRX Quantum 5, 010319 (2024).
  127. S. Scali, C. Umeano, and O. Kyriienko, Phys. Rev. A 110, 042616 (2024).
  128. S. Scali, C. Umeano, and O. Kyriienko, APL Quantum 1, 036106 (2024).
  129. Quantum vortex detection, https://github.com/cw962/quantum_vortex_detection.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation