Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Low-depth phase oracle using a parallel piecewise circuit

Zhu Sun1,2,*, Gregory Boyd1, Zhenyu Cai1, Hamza Jnane1,2, Bálint Koczor1,3, Richard Meister1,4, Romy Minko1,5, Benjamin Pring1,5, Simon C. Benjamin1,2 et al.

Nikitas Stamatopoulos6

  • *Contact author: zhu.sun@exeter.ox.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. A 111, 062420 – Published 16 June, 2025Erratum Phys. Rev. A 112, 019903 (2025)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/m32k-7nq2

Abstract

We explore the important task of applying a phase exp(if(x)) to a computational basis state |x〉. The closely related task of rotating a target qubit by an angle depending on f(x) is also studied. Such operations are key in many quantum subroutines, and frequently f(x) can be well approximated by a piecewise function; examples range from the application of diagonal Hamiltonian terms (such as the Coulomb interaction) in grid-based many-body simulation to derivative pricing algorithms. Here, we exploit a parallelization of the piecewise approach so that all constituent elementary rotations are performed simultaneously, that is, we achieve a total rotation depth of one. Moreover, we explore the use of recursive catalyst “towers” to implement these elementary rotations efficiently. We find that strategies prioritizing execution speed can achieve circuit depth as low as O(log2n+log2S) for a register of n qubits and a piecewise approximation of S sections (presuming prior preparation of enabling resource states), albeit total qubit count then scales with S. In the limit of multiple repetitions of the oracle, we find that catalyst tower approaches have an O(Sn) T-count.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Erratum

Erratum: Low-depth phase oracle using a parallel piecewise circuit [Phys. Rev. A 111, 062420 (2025)]

Zhu Sun, Gregory Boyd, Zhenyu Cai, Hamza Jnane, Bálint Koczor, Richard Meister, Romy Minko, Benjamin Pring, Simon C. Benjamin, and Nikitas Stamatopoulos
Phys. Rev. A 112, 019903 (2025)

Article Text

References (59)

  1. P. W. Shor, SIAM Rev. 41, 303 (1999).
  2. A. W. Harrow, A. Hassidim, and S. Lloyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 150502 (2009).
  3. T. Hogg and D. Portnov, Info. Sci. 128, 181 (2000).
  4. S. McArdle, S. Endo, A. Aspuru-Guzik, S. C. Benjamin, and X. Yuan, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 015003 (2020).
  5. D. Ackley, A Connectionist Machine for Genetic Hillclimbing (Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, 2012), Vol. 28.
  6. M. F. Gonzalez-Zalba, S. de Franceschi, E. Charbon, T. Meunier, M. Vinet, and A. S. Dzurak, Nat. Electron. 4, 872 (2021).
  7. X. Huang, T. Kosugi, H. Nishi, and Y.-i. Matsushita, Quantum Inf. Process. 24, 85 (2025).
  8. L. K. Grover, in Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (ACM Press, New York, 1996), pp. 212–219.
  9. D. R. Simon, SIAM J. Comput. 26, 1474 (1997).
  10. A. Gilyén, S. Arunachalam, and N. Wiebe, in Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SIAM, 2019), pp. 1425–1444.
  11. A. Y. Kitaev, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex. TR96 (1995).
  12. L. Grover and T. Rudolph, arXiv:quant-ph/0208112.
  13. M. Ozols, M. Roetteler, and J. Roland, ACM Trans. Comput. Theory 5, 1 (2013).
  14. S. McArdle, A. Gilyén, and M. Berta, arXiv:2210.14892.
  15. R. Babbush, C. Gidney, D. W. Berry, N. Wiebe, J. McClean, A. Paler, A. Fowler, and H. Neven, Phys. Rev. X 8, 041015 (2018).
  16. D. W. Berry, C. Gidney, M. Motta, J. R. McClean, and R. Babbush, Quantum 3, 208 (2019).
  17. J. Lee, D. W. Berry, C. Gidney, W. J. Huggins, J. R. McClean, N. Wiebe, and R. Babbush, PRX Quantum 2, 030305 (2021).
  18. D. W. Berry, N. C. Rubin, A. O. Elnabawy, G. Ahlers, A. E. DePrince, III, J. Lee, C. Gogolin, and R. Babbush, npj Quantum Inf. 10, 130 (2024).
  19. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 160501 (2008).
  20. S. Jaques and A. G. Rattew, arXiv:2305.10310.
  21. Y. R. Sanders, D. W. Berry, P. C. S. Costa, L. W. Tessler, N. Wiebe, C. Gidney, H. Neven, and R. Babbush, PRX Quantum 1, 020312 (2020).
  22. C. Gidney, Quantum 2, 74 (2018).
  23. K. Jang, W. Kim, S. Lim, Y. Kang, Y. Yang, and H. Seo, Sensors 23, 3156 (2023).
  24. J. Nie, Q. Zhu, M. Li, and X. Sun, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 42, 4791 (2023).
  25. M. Suzuki, Commun. Math. Phys. 51, 183 (1976).
  26. G. H. Low and I. L. Chuang, Quantum 3, 163 (2019).
  27. D. W. Berry and A. M. Childs, Quantum Inf. and Comput. 12, 29 (2012).
  28. N. J. Ross and P. Selinger, Quantum Inf. Comput. 16, 901 (2016).
  29. A. Bocharov, M. Roetteler, and K. M. Svore, Phys. Rev. A 91, 052317 (2015).
  30. E. Campbell, Phys. Rev. A 95, 042306 (2017).
  31. M. B. Hastings, Quantum Inf. Comput. 17, 488 (2017).
  32. V. Kliuchnikov, K. Lauter, R. Minko, A. Paetznick, and C. Petit, Quantum 7, 1208 (2023).
  33. G. Duclos-Cianci and D. Poulin, Phys. Rev. A 91, 042315 (2015).
  34. E. T. Campbell and J. O'Gorman, Quantum Sci. Technol. 1, 015007 (2016).
  35. C. Gidney and A. G. Fowler, Quantum 3, 135 (2019).
  36. A. C. Vazquez, R. Hiptmair, and S. Woerner, ACM Trans. Quantum Comput. 3, 1 (2022).
  37. T. Häner, M. Roetteler, and K. M. Svore, arXiv:1805.12445.
  38. G. Wang and A. Kan, Quantum 8, 1504 (2024).
  39. G. J. Mooney, C. D. Hill, and L. C. Hollenberg, Quantum 5, 396 (2021).
  40. C. Jones, Phys. Rev. A 87, 022328 (2013).
  41. Y. He, M.-X. Luo, E. Zhang, H.-K. Wang, and X.-F. Wang, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56, 2350 (2017).
  42. S. Chakrabarti, R. Krishnakumar, G. Mazzola, N. Stamatopoulos, S. Woerner, and W. J. Zeng, Quantum 5, 463 (2021).
  43. C. Gidney, N. Shutty, and C. Jones, arXiv:2409.17595.
  44. N. Stamatopoulos and W. J. Zeng, Quantum 8, 1322 (2024).
  45. D. Grinko, J. Gacon, C. Zoufal, and S. Woerner, npj Quantum Inf. 7, 52 (2021).
  46. F. Labib, B. D. Clader, N. Stamatopoulos, and W. J. Zeng, arXiv:2405.14697.
  47. H. H. S. Chan, R. Meister, T. Jones, D. P. Tew, and S. C. Benjamin, Sci. Adv. 9, eabo7484 (2023).
  48. H. Jnane and S. C. Benjamin, arXiv:2403.00191.
  49. R. Babbush, W. J. Huggins, D. W. Berry, S. F. Ung, A. Zhao, D. R. Reichman, H. Neven, A. D. Baczewski, and J. Lee, Nat. Commun. 14, 4058 (2023).
  50. A. M. Dalzell, S. McArdle, M. Berta, P. Bienias, C.-F. Chen, A. Gilyén, C. T. Hann, M. J. Kastoryano, E. T. Khabiboulline, A. Kubica et al., arXiv:2310.03011.
  51. T. N. Ikeda, H. Kono, and K. Fujii, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033285 (2024).
  52. J. D. Cifuentes, P. Y. Mai, F. Schlattner, H. E. Ercan, M. K. Feng, C. C. Escott, A. S. Dzurak, and A. Saraiva, Phys. Rev. B 108, 155413 (2023).
  53. M. M. E. K. Shehata, G. Simion, R. Li, F. A. Mohiyaddin, D. Wan, M. Mongillo, B. Govoreanu, I. Radu, K. De Greve, and P. Van Dorpe, Phys. Rev. B 108, 045305 (2023).
  54. T. Jones, A. Brown, I. Bush, and S. C. Benjamin, Sci. Rep. 9, 10736 (2019).
  55. T. Jones and S. Benjamin, Quantum Sci. Technol. 5, 034012 (2020).
  56. D. Litinski and F. von Oppen, Quantum 2, 62 (2018).
  57. H. H. Sohrab, Basic Real Analysis (Springer, New York, 2003), Vol. 231.
  58. S. Wang, A. Mondal, and A. Chattopadhyay, ACM Trans. Quantum Comput. (2025), doi:10.1145/3743691.
  59. R. Krishnakumar, M. Soeken, M. Roetteler, and W. Zeng, in 2022 IEEE/ACM Third International Workshop on Quantum Computing Software (QCS) (IEEE, New York, 2022), pp. 75–82.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation