Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Intense and controlled beam of S(D21) atoms

Alexandra Tsoukala, Saskia Bruil, Niek Janssen, Saskia Pieters, and Jolijn Onvlee*

  • Institute for Molecules and Materials, Radboud University, Heyendaalseweg 135, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands

  • *Contact author: j.onvlee@science.ru.nl

Phys. Rev. A 112, 053113 – Published 21 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/jy8h-fh3b

Abstract

We report the production of an intense and controlled beam of electronically excited sulfur atoms in the D21 state using a multistage Zeeman decelerator. Sulfur atoms, generated via photolysis of CS2, are produced in both the ground PJ3 and excited D21 states. We demonstrate that both can be manipulated using the decelerator, and that temporal separation between them can be achieved by operating in deceleration mode. This enables the generation of sulfur atom beams with a well-defined velocity, narrow velocity spreads, and an enhanced quantum-state purity. To assess the suitability of the beam for scattering studies, we performed a proof-of-principle elastic collision experiment with S(D21) and argon atoms. The observed velocity-map-imaging signal confirms that the S(D21) beam density is sufficient for detailed scattering studies. These results form the foundation for future studies of reactive and quenching processes involving S(D21) atoms at tunable and well-defined collision energies.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (52)

  1. K. Schofield, Critically evaluated rate constants for gaseous reactions of several electronically excited species, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 8, 723 (1979).
  2. M. Lara, C. Berteloite, M. Paniagua, F. Dayou, S. D. Le Picard, and J. M. Launay, Experimental and theoretical study of the collisional quenching of S(D1) by Ar, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 28555 (2017).
  3. D. M. G. Williams, N. Weike, M. Lara, K. M. Dunseath, and A. Viel, Electronic quenching of sulfur induced by argon collisions, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 27, 3722 (2025).
  4. G. Black and L. E. Jusinski, Rate coefficients for S(D1) removal at 300 K, J. Chem. Phys. 82, 789 (1985).
  5. J. E. Stout, B. K. Andrews, T. J. Bevilacqua, and R. B. Weisman, CARS observation of fine structure population inversion from atomic quenching: S(D1) + Ar → S(P03) + Ar, Chem. Phys. Lett. 151, 156 (1988).
  6. M. Ohashi, Z. Song, Y. Matsumi, and M. Kawasaki, Primary processes and energy disposal in the reaction of S(D1) atoms with thiirane, Chem. Phys. Lett. 220, 7 (1994).
  7. Y. Kuroko, H. Kohguchi, and K. Yamasaki, Nascent Vibrational Energy Distribution of CS(X1Σ+) Generated in the S(D1) + CS2 Reaction, J. Phys. Chem. A 127, 4055 (2023).
  8. S. Tendo, H. Tanimoto, K. Kobayashi, H. Kohguchi, and K. Yamasaki, Nascent vibrational distributions of S2(XΣg−3) generated in the S(D1)+OCS reaction and vibrational relaxation by collisions with He and CF4, Chem. Phys. Lett. 779, 138841 (2021).
  9. G. Di Genova, J. Perrero, M. Rosi, C. Ceccarelli, A. Rimola, and N. Balucani, Hot sulfur on the rocks: The reaction of electronically excited sulfur atoms with water in an ice-surface model, ACS Earth Space Chem. 9, 844 (2025).
  10. K. M. Hickson, P. Larrégaray, L. Bonnet, and T. González-Lezana, The kinetics of X+H2 reactions (X = C(D1), N(D2), O(D1), S(D1)) at low temperature: recent combined experimental and theoretical investigations, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 40, 457 (2021).
  11. F. J. Aoiz, L. Bañares, and V. J. Herrero, Dynamics of insertion reactions of H2 molecules with excited atoms, J. Phys. Chem. A 110, 12546 (2006).
  12. H. Guo, Quantum dynamics of complex-forming bimolecular reactions, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 31, 1 (2012).
  13. E. J. Rackham, T. Gonzalez-Lezana, and D. E. Manolopoulos, A rigorous test of the statistical model for atom–diatom insertion reactions, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 12895 (2003).
  14. T. González-Lezana, Statistical quantum studies on insertion atom–diatom reactions, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 26, 29 (2007).
  15. X. Yang and K. Liu, Modern Trends in Chemical Reaction Dynamics Part I: Experiment and Theory, Advanced Series in Physical Chemistry Vol. 14 (World Scientific, Singapore, 2004).
  16. Edited by M. Brouard and C. Vallance, in Tutorials in Molecular Reaction Dynamics (RSC Publishing, Cambridge, 2010).
  17. P. Casavecchia, Chemical reaction dynamics with molecular beams, Rep. Prog. Phys. 63, 355 (2000).
  18. H. Kohguchi and T. Suzuki, State-to-state rotational inelastic scattering of free radicals, Annu. Rep. Prog. Chem. C: Phys. Chem. 98, 421 (2002).
  19. K. Liu, Recent advances in crossed-beam studies of bimolecular reactions, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 132307 (2006).
  20. X. Yang, Probing state-to-state reaction dynamics using H-atom Rydberg tagging time-of-flight spectroscopy, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 8112 (2011).
  21. C. Naulin and M. Costes, Experimental search for scattering resonances in near cold molecular collisions, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 33, 427 (2014).
  22. F. J. Aoiz, M. Brouard, S. D. S. Gordon, B. Nichols, S. Stolte, and V. Walpole, A new perspective: imaging the stereochemistry of molecular collisions, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 30210 (2015).
  23. H. Pan, K. Liu, A. Caracciolo, and P. Casavecchia, Crossed beam polyatomic reaction dynamics: recent advances and new insights, Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 7517 (2017).
  24. A. T. J. B. Eppink and D. H. Parker, Velocity map imaging of ions and electrons using electrostatic lenses: Application in photoelectron and photofragment ion imaging of molecular oxygen, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68, 3477 (1997).
  25. S.-H. Lee and K. Liu, Isotope effects and excitation functions for the reactions of S(D1)+H2, D2 and HD, Chem. Phys. Lett. 290, 323 (1998).
  26. S.-H. Lee and K. Liu, Exploring insertion reaction dynamics: A case study of S(D1) + D2→ SD + D, J. Phys. Chem. A 102, 8637 (1998).
  27. S.-H. Lee and K. Liu, Direct mapping of insertion reaction dynamics: S(D1)+H2→ SH + H, Appl. Phys. B 71, 627 (2000).
  28. C. Berteloite, M. Lara, A. Bergeat, S. D. Le Picard, F. Dayou, K. M. Hickson, A. Canosa, C. Naulin, J.-M. Launay, I. R. Sims, and M. Costes, Kinetics and dynamics of the S(1D2) + H2→ SH + H reaction at very low temperatures and collision energies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 203201 (2010).
  29. M. Lara, F. Dayou, J.-M. Launay, A. Bergeat, K. M. Hickson, C. Naulin, and M. Costes, Observation of partial wave structures in the integral cross section of the S(D21) +H2(j  =  0) reaction, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 8127 (2011).
  30. M. Lara, S. Chefdeville, P. Larregaray, L. Bonnet, J.-M. Launay, M. Costes, C. Naulin, and A. Bergeat, S(D1) +ortho−D2 reaction dynamics at low collision energies: Complementary crossed molecular beam experiments and theoretical investigations, J. Phys. Chem. A 120, 5274 (2016).
  31. Y. Li, H. Wang, Z. Jiao, H. Zhang, B. Zhang, X. Wang, C. Xiao, and X. Yang, Experimental spin-orbit state-resolved differential cross sections of the s(D1) + D2→ SD(2Π3/2,1/2) + D reaction at collision energies of 266.2 and 206.5 cm−1, J. Phys. Chem. A 128, 10234 (2024).
  32. T. N. Kitsopoulos, C. R. Gebhardt, and T. P. Rakitzis, Photodissociation study of CS2 at 193 nm using slice imaging, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 9727 (2001).
  33. A. Mank, C. Starrs, M. N. Jego, and J. W. Hepburn, A detailed study of the predissociation dynamics of the 1B2(1Σu+) state of CS2, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 3609 (1996).
  34. W. B. Tzeng, H. M. Yin, W. Y. Leung, J. Y. Luo, S. Nourbakhsh, G. D. Flesch, and C. Y. Ng, A 193 nm laser photofragmentation time-of-flight mass spectrometric study of CS2 and CS2 clusters, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 1658 (1988).
  35. Z. Hu, W.-B. Lee, X.-P. Zhang, P.-Y. Wei, and K.-C. Lin, (1+1) resonance-enhanced multiphoton ionization and photodissociation study of CS2 via the 1B2 state, Chem. Phys. Chem. 9, 422 (2008).
  36. E. M. Warne, A. D. Smith, D. A. Horke, E. Springate, A. J. H. Jones, C. Cacho, R. T. Chapman, and R. S. Minns, Time resolved detection of the S(D1) product of the UV induced dissociation of CS2, J. Chem. Phys. 154, 034302 (2021).
  37. Z. Li, M. Zhao, T. Xie, Y. Chang, Z. Luo, Z. Chen, X. Wang, K. Yuan, and X. Yang, Velocity map imaging studies of the photodissociation of CS2 by two-photon excitation at around 303–315 nm, Mol. Phys. 119 (2020).
  38. I. M. Waller and J. W. Hepburn, Photofragment spectroscopy of CS2 at 193 nm: Direct resolution of singlet and triplet channels, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 3261 (1987).
  39. W. S. McGivern, O. Sorkhabi, A. H. Rizvi, A. G. Suits, and S. W. North, Photofragment translational spectroscopy with state-selective “universal detection:” The ultraviolet photodissociation of CS2, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 5301 (2000).
  40. D. Xu, J. Huang, and W. M. Jackson, Reinvestigation of CS2 dissociation at 193 nm by means of product state-selective vacuum ultraviolet laser ionization and velocity imaging, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 3051 (2004).
  41. T. Cremers, S. Chefdeville, V. Plomp, N. Janssen, E. Sweers, and S. Y. T. van de Meerakker, Multistage Zeeman deceleration of atomic and molecular oxygen, Phys. Rev. A 98, 033406 (2018).
  42. V. Plomp, Z. Gao, T. Cremers, M. Besemer, and S. Y. T. van de Meerakker, High-resolution imaging of molecular collisions using a Zeeman decelerator, J. Chem. Phys. 152, 091103 (2020).
  43. V. Plomp, Z. Gao, T. Cremers, and S. Y. T. van de Meerakker, Multistage Zeeman deceleration of NH X Σ−3 radicals, Phys. Rev. A 99, 033417 (2019).
  44. V. Plomp, X.-D. Wang, F. Lique, J. Kłos, J. Onvlee, and S. Y. T. van de Meerakker, High-resolution imaging of C + He collisions using Zeeman deceleration and vacuum-ultraviolet detection, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12, 12210 (2021).
  45. T. Cremers, N. Janssen, E. Sweers, and S. Y. T. van de Meerakker, Design and construction of a multistage Zeeman decelerator for crossed molecular beams scattering experiments, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90, 013104 (2019).
  46. B. Yan, P. F. H. Claus, B. G. M. van Oorschot, L. Gerritsen, A. T. J. B. Eppink, S. Y. T. van de Meerakker, and D. H. Parker, A new high intensity and short-pulse molecular beam valve, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 84, 023102 (2013).
  47. C. Weeraratna, C. Amarasinghe, R. Fernando, V. Tiwari, and A. G. Suits, Convenient (1+1) probe of S(D21) and application to photodissociation of carbonyl sulfide at 216.9 nm, Chem. Phys. Lett. 657, 162 (2016).
  48. C.-W. Hsu, C.-L. Liao, Z.-X. Ma, P. J. H. Tjossem, and C. Y. Ng, A study of the S(P2,1,03;D21) production in the 193 nm photodissociation of CH3 S(X̃), J. Chem. Phys. 97, 6283 (1992).
  49. V. Plomp, Z. Gao, and S. Y. T. van de Meerakker, A velocity map imaging apparatus optimised for high-resolution crossed molecular beam experiments, Mol. Phys. 119, e1814437 (2021).
  50. T. Cremers, S. Chefdeville, N. Janssen, E. Sweers, S. Koot, P. Claus, and S. Y. T. van de Meerakker, Multistage Zeeman decelerator for molecular-scattering studies, Phys. Rev. A 95, 043415 (2017).
  51. U. Even, Pulsed supersonic beams from high pressure source: Simulation results and experimental measurements, Adv. Chem. 2014, 1 (2014).
  52. A. Tsoukala, S. Bruil, N. Janssen, S. Pieters, and J. Onvlee, Dataset for publication “An intense and controlled beam of S(D21) atoms,” https://data.ru.nl/collections/ru/imm/scm_2025_tsoukala_pra_dsc_663.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation