- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review A

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Few-to-many-particle crossover of pair excitations in a superfluid

Fabian Resare1 and Johannes Hofmann2,3,*

  • *Contact author: johannes.hofmann@physics.gu.se
PDF

Phys. Rev. A 110, L061302 – Published 3 December, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.110.L061302

Abstract

Motivated by recent advances in the creation of few-body atomic Fermi gases with attractive interactions, we study theoretically the few-to-many-particle crossover of pair excitations, which for large particle numbers evolve into a mode that describes amplitude fluctuations of the superfluid order parameter (the “Higgs” mode). Our analysis is based on the hypothesis that salient aspects of the excitation spectrum are captured by interactions between time-reversed pair states in a harmonic oscillator potential. Microscopically, this assumption leads to a Richardson-type pairing model, which is integrable and thus allows a systematic quantitative study of the few-to-many-particle crossover with only minor numerical effort. We first establish a parity effect in the ground-state energy, i.e., a spectral convexity in the energy of open-shell configurations compared to their closed-shell neighbors, which is quantified by a so-called Matveev-Larkin parameter discussed for mesoscopic superconductors, which generalizes the pairing gap to mesoscopic ensembles and which behaves quantitatively differently in a few-body and a many-body regime. The crossover point for this quantity is widely tunable as a function of interaction strength. We then compute the excitation spectrum and demonstrate that the pair excitation energy shows a minimum that deepens with increasing particle number and shifts to smaller interaction strengths, consistent with the finite-size precursor of a quantum phase transition to a superfluid state. We extract a critical finite-size scaling exponent that characterizes the decrease of the gap with increasing particle number.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (49)

  1. P. W. Anderson, More is different, Science 177, 393 (1972).
  2. K. Rademann, B. Kaiser, U. Even, and F. Hensel, Size dependence of the gradual transition to metallic properties in isolated mercury clusters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2319 (1987).
  3. A. P. Alivisatos, Semiconductor clusters, nanocrystals, and quantum dots, Science 271, 933 (1996).
  4. S. M. Reimann and M. Manninen, Electronic structure of quantum dots, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 1283 (2002).
  5. D. C. Ralph, C. T. Black, and M. Tinkham, Spectroscopic measurements of discrete electronic states in single metal particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3241 (1995).
  6. C. T. Black, D. C. Ralph, and M. Tinkham, Spectroscopy of the superconducting gap in individual nanometer-scale aluminum particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 688 (1996).
  7. D. C. Ralph, C. T. Black, and M. Tinkham, Gate-voltage studies of discrete electronic states in aluminum nanoparticles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4087 (1997).
  8. F. Serwane, G. Zürn, T. Lompe, T. B. Ottenstein, A. N. Wenz, and S. Jochim, Deterministic preparation of a tunable few-fermion system, Science 332, 336 (2011).
  9. G. Zürn, A. N. Wenz, S. Murmann, A. Bergschneider, T. Lompe, and S. Jochim, Pairing in few-fermion systems with attractive interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 175302 (2013).
  10. L. Bayha, M. Holten, R. Klemt, K. Subramanian, J. Bjerlin, S. M. Reimann, G. M. Bruun, P. M. Preiss, and S. Jochim, Observing the emergence of a quantum phase transition shell by shell, Nature (London) 587, 583 (2020).
  11. M. Holten, L. Bayha, K. Subramanian, C. Heintze, P. M. Preiss, and S. Jochim, Observation of Pauli crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 020401 (2021).
  12. M. Holten, L. Bayha, K. Subramanian, S. Brandstetter, C. Heintze, P. Lunt, P. M. Preiss, and S. Jochim, Observation of Cooper pairs in a mesoscopic two-dimensional fermi gas, Nature (London) 606, 287 (2022).
  13. G. M. Bruun, Long-lived Higgs mode in a two-dimensional confined Fermi system, Phys. Rev. A 90, 023621 (2014).
  14. J. Hofmann, A. M. Lobos, and V. Galitski, Parity effect in a mesoscopic Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. A 93, 061602(R) (2016).
  15. J. Hofmann, Mesoscopic pairing without superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 96, 220508(R) (2017).
  16. R. W. Richardson, A restricted class of exact eigenstates of the pairing-force Hamiltonian, Phys. Lett. 3, 277 (1963).
  17. R. W. Richardson and N. Sherman, Exact eigenstates of the pairing-force Hamiltonian, Nucl. Phys. 52, 221 (1964).
  18. R. W. Richardson, Exact eigenstates of the pairing force Hamiltonian. II, J. Math. Phys. 6, 1034 (1965).
  19. R. W. Richardson, Numerical study of the 8-32-particle eigenstates of the pairing Hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. 141, 949 (1966).
  20. J. von Delft and D. C. Ralph, Spectroscopy of discrete energy levels in ultrasmall metallic grains, Phys. Rep. 345, 61 (2001).
  21. J. Dukelsky, S. Pittel, and G. Sierra, Colloquium: Exactly solvable Richardson-Gaudin models for many-body quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 643 (2004).
  22. P. A. Johnson, Richardson-Gaudin states, arXiv:2312.08804.
  23. M. Rontani, J. R. Armstrong, Y. Yu, S. Åberg, and S. M. Reimann, Cold fermionic atoms in two-dimensional traps: Pairing versus Hund's rule, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 060401 (2009).
  24. T. Sowiński, T. Grass, O. Dutta, and M. Lewenstein, Few interacting fermions in a one-dimensional harmonic trap, Phys. Rev. A 88, 033607 (2013).
  25. P. D'Amico and M. Rontani, Pairing of a few Fermi atoms in one dimension, Phys. Rev. A 91, 043610 (2015).
  26. T. Sowiński, M. Gajda, and K. Rzażewski, Pairing in a system of a few attractive fermions in a harmonic trap, Europhys. Lett. 109, 26005 (2015).
  27. T. Grining, M. Tomza, M. Lesiuk, M. Przybytek, M. Musiał, R. Moszynski, M. Lewenstein, and P. Massignan, Crossover between few and many fermions in a harmonic trap, Phys. Rev. A 92, 061601(R) (2015).
  28. J. Bjerlin, S. M. Reimann, and G. M. Bruun, Few-body precursor of the Higgs mode in a Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 155302 (2016).
  29. M. Rontani, G. Eriksson, S. Åberg, and S. M. Reimann, On the renormalization of contact interactions for the configuration-interaction method in two-dimensions, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 50, 065301 (2017).
  30. V. Bekassy and J. Hofmann, Nonrelativistic conformal invariance in mesoscopic two-dimensional Fermi gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 193401 (2022).
  31. V. Bekassy and J. Hofmann, Scale and conformal invariance in rotating interacting few-fermion systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023279 (2024).
  32. E. Laird, B. Mulkerin, J. Wang, and M. Davis, When does a Fermi puddle become a Fermi sea? Emergence of pairing in two-fimensional trapped mesoscopic Fermi gases, arXiv:2408.17015.
  33. C. E. Berger, E. R. Anderson, and J. E. Drut, Energy, contact, and density profiles of one-dimensional fermions in a harmonic trap via nonuniform-lattice Monte Carlo calculations, Phys. Rev. A 91, 053618 (2015).
  34. L. Rammelmüller, W. J. Porter, and J. E. Drut, Ground state of the two-dimensional attractive Fermi gas: Essential properties from few to many body, Phys. Rev. A 93, 033639 (2016).
  35. Z. Luo, C. E. Berger, and J. E. Drut, Harmonically trapped fermions in two dimensions: Ground-state energy and contact of SU(2) and SU(4) systems via a nonuniform lattice Monte Carlo method, Phys. Rev. A 93, 033604 (2016).
  36. K. A. Matveev and A. I. Larkin, Parity effect in ground state energies of ultrasmall superconducting grains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3749 (1997).
  37. J. von Delft and F. Braun, Superconductivity in ultrasmall grains: Introduction to Richardson's exact solution, in Quantum Mesoscopic Phenomena and Mesoscopic Devices in Microelectronics, edited by I. O. Kulik and R. Ellialtioglu, NATO Science Series Vol. 559 (Springer, Dordrecht, 2000), p. 361.
  38. A. Faribault, O. El Araby, C. Sträter, and V. Gritsev, Gaudin models solver based on the correspondence between Bethe ansatz and ordinary differential equations, Phys. Rev. B 83, 235124 (2011).
  39. O. El Araby, V. Gritsev, and A. Faribault, Bethe ansatz and ordinary differential equation correspondence for degenerate Gaudin models, Phys. Rev. B 85, 115130 (2012).
  40. P. W. Claeys, S. De Baerdemacker, M. Van Raemdonck, and D. Van Neck, Eigenvalue-based method and form-factor determinant representations for integrable XXZ Richardson-Gaudin models, Phys. Rev. B 91, 155102 (2015).
  41. F. Resare, Richardson models for mesoscopic pairing interactions, Master's thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, 2022, https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12380/305255.
  42. D. Lee, Spectral convexity for attractive SU(2N) fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 182501 (2007).
  43. J. M. Román, G. Sierra, and J. Dukelsky, Elementary excitations of the BCS model in the canonical ensemble, Phys. Rev. B 67, 064510 (2003).
  44. G. Cheng, M. Tomczyk, S. Lu, J. P. Veazey, M. Huang, P. Irvin, S. Ryu, H. Lee, C.-B. Eom, C. S. Hellberg, and J. Levy, Electron pairing without superconductivity, Nature (London) 521, 196 (2015).
  45. G. M. Bruun, Low-energy monopole modes of a trapped atomic Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 263002 (2002).
  46. A. Larkin and A. Varlamov, Theory of Fluctuations in Superconductors (Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K., 2005).
  47. L. N. Cooper, Bound electron pairs in a degenerate fermi gas, Phys. Rev. 104, 1189 (1956).
  48. H.-Q. Zhou, J. Links, R. H. McKenzie, and M. D. Gould, Superconducting correlations in metallic nanoparticles: Exact solution of the BCS model by the algebraic Bethe ansatz, Phys. Rev. B 65, 060502(R) (2002).
  49. A. Faribault, P. Calabrese, and J.-S. Caux, Exact mesoscopic correlation functions of the Richardson pairing model, Phys. Rev. B 77, 064503 (2008).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. A 110, L061302– Published 3 December, 2024
  • Received 9 September 2024
  • Accepted 14 November 2024
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by Bibsam.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation