- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review A

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Extreme electrodynamics in time-varying media

M. Scalora1, M. A. Vincenti2, D. de Ceglia2, N. Akozbek3, M. Ferrera4, C. Rizza5, A. Alù6,7, N. Litchinitser8, C. Cojocaru9 et al.

J. Trull9

PDF

Phys. Rev. A 112, 013502 – Published 2 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/5cjl-ltvg

Abstract

Abrupt time variations of the properties of optical materials have been at the center of intense research efforts in recent years, with the prospect of enabling extreme wave transformations and of leveraging time as a degree of freedom for wave control. While the most viable approach to yield ultrafast variations of the optical material response is through optical pumping of nonlinear media, the complex dynamics in these systems are not yet fully understood. Here, as a relevant case study of recent experimental observations, we rigorously investigate the pump-probe dynamics in a 310-nm-thick transparent conductive oxide etalon, using a weak 40-fs probe and a pump that displays peak power densities in the TW/cm2 range with a duration of a few femtoseconds. We examine the pump-probe interaction using a hydrodynamic Maxwell approach that accounts for diffraction, self-focusing and self-defocusing, self- and cross-phase modulation, probe gain, and linear and nonlinear material dispersion expanded in the perturbative regime up to ninth order for both pump and probe. By allowing the intricacies of the pump-probe interaction to proceed in time, we can also define an effective spatiotemporal permittivity for a more direct evaluation of the material ultrabroadband optical behavior. The reported results challenge the conventional modeling of this kind of problem, which has so far overlooked pump dynamics, simplistically assigning a local time-dependent refractive index to the probe that may be designed to fit the experimental data but has no physical connection to the complex pump-probe interaction. Our approach unveils new dynamics, pointing toward the possibility to achieve extreme pulse compression into the attosecond range and nonlinear diffraction over deeply subwavelength propagation distances, thus opening a possible new path toward novel and cost-effective tools for integrated photonics and attosecond science.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (55)

  1. G. Z. Kiss, P. Földi, and P. Dombi, Ultrafast plasmonic photoemission in the single-cycle and few-cycle regimes, Sci. Rep. 12, 3932 (2022).
  2. U. Parali, Ultrafast time domain optics of single-cycle laser pulse interaction with materials, Ph.D. thesis, Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, 2010.
  3. E. Lustig, O. Segal, S. Saha, E. Bordo, S. N. Chowdhury, Y. Sharabi, A. Fleischer, A. Boltasseva, O. Cohen, V. M. Shalaev, and M. Segev, Time-refraction optics with single cycle modulation, Nanophotonics 12, 2221 (2023).
  4. C. Rizza, M. A. Vincenti, G. Castaldi, A. Contestabile, V. Galdi, and M. Scalora, Harnessing the natural resonances of time-varying dispersive interfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 186902 (2024).
  5. N. Engheta, Metamaterials with high degrees of freedom: Space, time, and more, Nanophotonics 10, 639 (2020).
  6. C. Caloz et al., Generalized space-time engineered modulation (GSTEM) metamaterials: A global and extended perspective, IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 65, 50 (2022).
  7. N. Engheta, Four-dimensional optics using time-varying metamaterials, Science 379, 1190 (2023).
  8. E. Galiffi et al., Broadband coherent wave control through photonic collisions at time interfaces, Nat. Phys. 19, 1703 (2023).
  9. H. Moussa, G. Xu, S. Yin, E. Galiffi, Y. Ra'di, and A. Alù et al., Observation of temporal reflection and broadband frequency translation at photonic time interfaces, Nat. Phys. 19, 863 (2023).
  10. M. Giloan and R. Gutt, Designing flat optical devices for path and wave vector manipulation by space transformation along a fixed direction, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 38, 9 (2021).
  11. B. A. Munk, Frequency Selective Surfaces (Wiley, New York, 2000).
  12. A. M. Melo, M. A. Kornberg, P. Kaufmann, M. H. Piazzetta, E. C. Bortolucci, M. B. Zakia, O. H. Bauer, A. Poglitsch, and A. M. P. Alves da Silva, Metal mesh resonant filters for terahertz frequencies, Appl. Opt. 47, 6064 (2008).
  13. N. Yu and F. Capasso, Flat optics with designer metasurfaces, Nat. Mater. 13, 139 (2014).
  14. A. V. Kildishev, A. Boltasseva, and V. M. Shalaev, Planar photonics with metasurfaces, Science 339, 1232009 (2013).
  15. A. I. Kuznetsov et al., Roadmap for optical metasurfaces, ACS Photonics 11, 816 (2024).
  16. J. T. Mendonça, Time refraction and space time optics, Symmetry 16, 1548 (2024).
  17. T. J. Cui et al., Roadmap on electromagnetic metamaterials and metasurfaces, J. Phys. Photonics 6, 032502 (2024).
  18. W. Jaffray, S. Saha, V. M. Shalaev, A. Boltasseva, and M. Ferrera, Transparent conducting oxides: From all-dielectric plasmonics to a new paradigm in integrated photonics, Adv. Opt. Photonics 14, 148 (2022).
  19. J. D. Joannopoulos, S. G. Johnson, J. N. Winn, and R. D. Meade, Photonic Crystals: Molding the Flow of Light, 2nd ed. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2008).
  20. Y. Radi, N. Nefedkin, P. Popovski, and A. Alù, Nonlinear, active, and time-varying metasurfaces for wireless communications: A perspective and opportunities, IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 66, 52 (2024).
  21. M. Attygalle and D. Stepanov, Linear photonic technique for fixed and time varying RF phase shifts of radar signals, Opt. Express 20, 18025 (2012).
  22. G. Toscano, S. Raza, W. Yan, C. Jeppesen, S. Xiao, M. Wubs, A-P Jauho, S. I. Bozhevolnyi, and N. A. Mortensen, Nonlocal response in plasmonic waveguiding with extreme light confinement, Nanophotonics 2, 161 (2013).
  23. G. Toscano, J. Straubel, A. Kwiatkowski, C. Rockstuhl, F. Evers, Hongxing Xu, N. Asger Mortensen, and M. Wubs, Resonance shifts and spill-out effects in self-consistent hydrodynamic nanoplasmonics, Nat. Commun. 6, 7132 (2015).
  24. C. Ciracì, R. T. Hill, J. J. Mock, Y. Urzhumov, A. I. Fernández-Domínguez, S. A. Maier, J. B. Pendry, A. Chilkoti, and D. R. Smith, Probing the ultimate limits of plasmonic enhancement, Science 337, 1072 (2012).
  25. H. M. Baghramyan, F. Della Sala, and C. Ciracì, Laplacian-level quantum hydrodynamic theory for plasmonics, Phys. Rev. X 11, 011049 (2021).
  26. F. De Luca and C. Ciracì, Impact of surface charge depletion on the free electron nonlinear response of heavily doped semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 123902 (2022).
  27. M. Scalora, M. A. Vincenti, D. de Ceglia, N. Akozbek, M. J. Bloemer, C. De Angelis, J. W. Haus, R. Vilaseca, J. Trull, and C. Cojocaru, Harmonic generation from metal-oxide and metal-metal boundaries, Phys. Rev. A 98, 023837 (2018).
  28. R. Esteban, A. Zugarramurdi, P. Zhang, P. Nordlander, F. J. García-Vidal, A. G. Borisov, and J. Aizpurua, A classical treatment of optical tunneling in plasmonic gaps: Extending the quantum corrected model to practical situations, Faraday Discuss. 178, 151 (2015).
  29. J. W. Haus, D. de Ceglia, M. A. Vincenti, and M. Scalora, Quantum conductivity for metal–insulator–metal nanostructures, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 31, 259 (2014).
  30. J. B. Pendry, Negative refraction makes a perfect lens, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3966 (2000).
  31. N. Aközbek, A. Iwasaki, A. Becker, M. Scalora, S. L. Chin, and C. M. Bowden, Third-harmonic generation and self-channeling in air using high-power femtosecond laser pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 143901 (2002).
  32. M. Scalora, M. A. Vincenti, D. de Ceglia, V. Roppo, M. Centini, N. Akozbek, and M. J. Bloemer, Second- and third-harmonic generation in metal-based structures, Phys. Rev. A 82, 043828 (2010).
  33. J. Sun, S. Z. Silahli, W. Walasik, Q. Li, E. Johnson, and N. M. Litchinitser, Nanoscale orbital angular momentum beam instabilities in engineered nonlinear colloidal media, Opt. Express 26, 5118 (2018).
  34. C. M. Bowden and J. P. Dowling, Near–dipole-dipole effects in dense media: Generalized Maxwell-Bloch equations, Phys. Rev. A 47, 1247 (1993).
  35. M. E. Crenshaw, M. Scalora, and C. M. Bowden, Ultrafast intrinsic optical switching in a dense medium of two-level atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 911 (1992).
  36. J. P. Dowling and C. M. Bowden, Near dipole-dipole effects in lasing without inversion: An enhancement of gain and absorptionless index of refraction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1421 (1993).
  37. W. Jaffray, F. Belli, S. Stengel, M. A. Vincenti, M. Scalora, M. Clerici, V. M Shalaev, A. Boltasseva, and M. Ferrera, High-order nonlinear frequency conversion in transparent conducting oxide thin films, Adv. Opt. Mater. 12, 2401249 (2024).
  38. K. Hallman et al., High-harmonic generation from subwavelength silicon films, Nanophotonics (2025), doi:10.1515/nanoph-2024-0468.
  39. E. J. Moniz and D. H. Sharp, Radiation reaction in nonrelativistic quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 15, 2850 (1977).
  40. G. W. Ford and R. F. O’Connell, Radiation reaction in electrodynamics and the elimination of runaway solutions, Phys. Lett. A 157, 217 (1991).
  41. R. F. O’Connell, Radiation reaction: General approach and applications, especially to electrodynamics, Contemp. Phys. 53, 301 (2012).
  42. M. Scalora, M. A. Vincenti, D. de Ceglia, N. Akozbek, M. J. Bloemer, L. Roso, J. Trull, C. Cojocaru, and J. W. Haus, Reevaluation of radiation reaction and consequences for light-matter interactions at the nanoscale, Opt. Express 26, 18055 (2018).
  43. A. Capretti, A. Lesage, and T. Gregorkiewicz, Integrating quantum dots and dielectric Mie resonators: A hierarchical metamaterial inheriting the best of both, ACS Photonics 4, 2187 (2017).
  44. J. Khurgin and N. Kensey, Nonperturbative nonlinearities: Perhaps less than meets the eye, ACS Photonics 11, 2874 (2024).
  45. J. E. Sipe, V. C. Y. So, M. Fukui, and G. I. Stegeman, Analysis of second-harmonic generation at metal surfaces, Phys. Rev. B 21, 4389 (1980).
  46. M. M. Asgari, P. Garg, X. Wang, M. S. Mismoosa, C. Rockstuhl, and V. Asadchy, Theory and applications of photonic time crystals: A tutorial, Adv. Opt. Photonics 16, 958 (2024).
  47. M. S. Mirmoosa, T. T. Koutserimpas, G. A. Ptitcyn, S. A. Tretyakov, and R. Fleury, Dipole polarizability of time-varying particles, New J. Phys. 24, 063004 (2022).
  48. T. Koutsermpas and F. Monticone, Time-varying media, dispersion, and the principle of causality, Opt. Mater. Exp. 14, 1222 (2024).
  49. Z. Hayran, J. Khurgin, and F. Monticone, ℏω versus ℏk: Dispersion and energy constraints on time-varying photonic materials and time crystals, Opt. Mater. Express 12, 3904 (2022).
  50. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/5cjl-ltvg for the videos referenced in the main manuscript, and additional information for (i) Probe gain for various layer thicknesses; (ii) Energy velocity; (iii) Additional example on nonlinear probe transmission and reflection; (iv) Temperature dependent damping and pressure: modifications of the hydrodynamic model; (v) Pump and probe spectra of two initial pumping conditions.
  51. L. Rodríguez-Suné, M. Scalora, A. S. Johnson, C. Cojocaru, N. Akozbek, Z. J. Coppens, D. Perez-Salinas, S. Wall, and J. Trull, Study of second and third harmonic generation from an indium tin oxide nanolayer: Influence of nonlocal effects and hot electrons, APL Photonics 5, 010801 (2020).
  52. R. Secondo, A. Ball, B. Diroll, D. Fomra, K. Ding, V. Avrutin, Ü. Özgür, D. O. Demchenko, J. B. Khurgin, and N. Kinsey, Deterministic modeling of hybrid nonlinear effects in epsilon-near-zero thin films, Appl. Phys. Lett. 120, 031103 (2022).
  53. A. Marini, M. Conforti, G. Della Valle, H. W. Lee, Tr. X. Tran, W. Chang, M. A. Schmidt, S. Longhi, P. St. J. Russell, and F. Biancalana, Ultrafast nonlinear dynamics of surface plasmon polaritons in gold nanowires due to the intrinsic nonlinearity of metals, New J. Phys. 15, 013033 (2013).
  54. V. E. Alexopoulou and A. P. Markopoulos, A critical assessment regarding two-temperature models: An investigation of the different forms of two-temperature models, the various ultrashort pulsed laser models and computational methods, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 31, 93 (2024).
  55. I.-W. Un, S. Sarkar, and Y. Sivan, Electronic-based model of the optical nonlinearity of low-electron-density drude materials, Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 044043 (2023).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. A 112, 013502– Published 2 July, 2025
  • Received 1 March 2025
  • Accepted 29 May 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation