Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Quantifying information flow in quantum processes

Leonardo S. V. Santos1,*, Zhen-Peng Xu2,1,†, Jyrki Piilo3,‡, and Otfried Gühne1,§

  • 1Naturwissenschaftlich-Technische Fakultät, Universität Siegen, Walter-Flex-Straße 3, 57068 Siegen, Germany
  • 2School of Physics and Optoelectronics Engineering, Anhui University, 230601 Hefei, China
  • 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Turku, FI-20014, Turun Yliopisto, Finland

  • *Contact author: leonardo.svsantos@student.uni-siegen.de
  • †Contact author: zhen-peng.xu@ahu.edu.cn
  • ‡Contact author: jyrki.piilo@utu.fi
  • §Contact author: otfried.guehne@uni-siegen.de

Phys. Rev. A 112, 022201 – Published 1 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/5211-h7g2

Abstract

We present a framework for quantifying information flow within general quantum processes. For this purpose, we introduce the signaling power of quantum channels and discuss its relevant operational properties. This function supports extensions to higher-order maps, enabling the evaluation of information flow in general quantum causal networks and processes with indefinite causal order. Furthermore, our results offer a rigorous approach to information dynamics in open systems that applies also in the presence of initial system-environment correlations, and allows for the distinction between classical and quantum information backflow.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (40)

  1. R. Landauer, Phys. Today 44, 23 (1991).
  2. P. Taranto, S. Milz, M. Murao, M. T. Quintino, and K. Modi, arXiv:2503.09693v1.
  3. G. Chiribella, G. M. D'Ariano, and P. Perinotti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 060401 (2008).
  4. G. Chiribella, New J. Phys. 14, 125008 (2012).
  5. J. Bavaresco, P. Lipka-Bartosik, P. Sekatski, and M. Mehboudi, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023305 (2024).
  6. F. A. Pollock, C. Rodríguez-Rosario, T. Frauenheim, M. Paternostro, and K. Modi, Phys. Rev. A 97, 012127 (2018).
  7. O. Oreshkov, F. Costa, and Č. Brukner, Nat. Commun. 3, 1092 (2012).
  8. G. Chiribella, G. M. D'Ariano, P. Perinotti, and B. Valiron, Phys. Rev. A 88, 022318 (2013).
  9. G. Chiribella and Z. Liu, Commun. Phys. 5, 190 (2022).
  10. H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, and J. Piilo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 210401 (2009).
  11. H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, J. Piilo, and B. Vacchini, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 021002 (2016).
  12. M.-D. Choi, Linear Algebra Appl. 10, 285 (1975).
  13. A. Jamiołkowski, Rep. Math. Phys. 3, 275 (1972).
  14. P. Skrzypczyk and D. Cavalcanti, Semidefinite Programming in Quantum Information Science (IOP Publishing, New York, 2023).
  15. R. Konig, R. Renner, and C. Schaffner, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 55, 4337 (2009).
  16. C. H. Bennett and S. J. Wiesner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2881 (1992).
  17. M. Horodecki and M. Piani, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45, 105306 (2012).
  18. G. Moreno, R. Nery, C. de Gois, R. Rabelo, and R. Chaves, Phys. Rev. A 103, 022426 (2021).
  19. G. Chiribella, G. M. D'Ariano, and P. Perinotti, EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 83, 30004 (2008).
  20. G. Chiribella, G. M. D'Ariano, and P. Perinotti, Phys. Rev. A 80, 022339 (2009).
  21. D. Rosset, F. Buscemi, and Y.-C. Liang, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021033 (2018).
  22. S. Popescu and D. Rohrlich, Found. Phys. 24, 379 (1994).
  23. M. Pawłowski, T. Paterek, D. Kaszlikowski, V. Scarani, A. Winter, and M. Żukowski, Nature (London) 461, 1101 (2009).
  24. N. Miklin and M. Pawłowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 220403 (2021).
  25. P. Jain, M. Gachechiladze, and N. Miklin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 160201 (2024).
  26. A. Smirne, J. Kołodyński, S. F. Huelga, and R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 120801 (2016).
  27. Á. Rivas, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 094001 (2014).
  28. J. Teittinen, H. Lyyra, B. Sokolov, and S. Maniscalco, New J. Phys. 20, 073012 (2018).
  29. M. J. W. Hall, J. D. Cresser, L. Li, and E. Andersson, Phys. Rev. A 89, 042120 (2014).
  30. J. Teittinen and S. Maniscalco, Entropy 23, 331 (2021).
  31. S. N. Filippov, A. N. Glinov, and L. Leppäjärvi, Lobachevskii J. Math. 41, 617 (2020).
  32. D. Kretschmann and R. F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 72, 062323 (2005).
  33. F. Costa and S. Shrapnel, New J. Phys. 18, 063032 (2016).
  34. S. Milz, J. Bavaresco, and G. Chiribella, Quantum 6, 788 (2022).
  35. N. Brunner, D. Cavalcanti, S. Pironio, V. Scarani, and S. Wehner, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 419 (2014).
  36. C. Giarmatzi and F. Costa, Quantum 5, 440 (2021).
  37. M. Horodecki, P. W. Shor, and M. B. Ruskai, Rev. Math. Phys. 15, 629 (2003).
  38. S. M. Barnett and S. Croke, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42, 062001 (2009).
  39. J.-P. W. MacLean, K. Ried, R. W. Spekkens, and K. J. Resch, Nat. Commun. 8, 15149 (2017).
  40. M. Araújo, C. Branciard, F. Costa, A. Feix, C. Giarmatzi, and Č. Brukner, New J. Phys. 17, 102001 (2015).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation