- Open Access
Transition from statistical to hardware-limited scaling in photonic quantum state reconstruction
Phys. Rev. A 114, 023709 – Published 10 August, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/3gsc-krrq
Abstract
The theoretical efficiency of classical shadow tomography is predicated on a perfect Haar-random unitary ensemble, yet this mathematical ideal remains physically unattainable in near-term hardware. Here, we report the experimental characterization of a hardware-induced systematic error floor on integrated photonic processors: an operational Hardware Horizon, where the reconstruction error undergoes a sharp crossover. While the error initially obeys the predicted statistical scaling in a variance-dominated regime, it abruptly saturates at a floor determined by the spectral distortions of the realized unitary group, marking a transition to a bias-dominated regime. By deriving a phenomenological error model, we decouple the competing mechanisms of static coherent spectral distortion and dynamic decoherence, demonstrating that this device-specific noise floor imposes a systematic saturation limit that statistical accumulation cannot overcome. These findings establish that the utility of shadow tomography on NISQ (noisy intermediate-scale quantum) hardware is defined by a specific scaling law involving hardware parameters, necessitating active compensation strategies to bridge the gap between theoretical purity and the noisy reality of integrated photonics.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (18)
- H.-Y. Huang, R. Kueng, and J. Preskill, Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements, Nat. Phys. 16, 1050 (2020).
- Z. Hradil, Quantum-state estimation, Phys. Rev. A 55, R1561 (1997).
- R. T. Thew, K. Nemoto, A. G. White, and W. J. Munro, Qudit quantum-state tomography, Phys. Rev. A 66, 012303 (2002).
- D. Gross, Y.-K. Liu, S. T. Flammia, S. Becker, and J. Eisert, Quantum state tomography via compressed sensing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 150401 (2010).
- M. Cramer, M. B. Plenio, S. T. Flammia, R. Somma, D. Gross, S. D. Bartlett, O. Landon-Cardinal, D. Poulin, and Y.-K. Liu, Efficient quantum state tomography, Nat. Commun. 1, 149 (2010).
- S. Aaronson, Shadow tomography of quantum states, in Proceedings of the 50th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2018), pp. 325–338.
- S. Slussarenko and G. J. Pryde, Photonic quantum information processing: A concise review, Appl. Phys. Rev. 6, 041303 (2019).
- S. Shekhar, W. Bogaerts, L. Chrostowski, J. E. Bowers, M. Hochberg, R. Soref, and B. J. Shastri, Roadmapping the next generation of silicon photonics, Nat. Commun. 15, 751 (2024).
- C. G. Roeloffzen, M. Hoekman, E. J. Klein, L. S. Wevers, R. B. Timens, D. Marchenko, D. Geskus, R. Dekker, A. Alippi, and R. Grootjans, Low-loss Si3N4 TriPleX optical waveguides: Technology and applications overview, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 24, 1 (2018).
- Quix quantum, https://www.quixquantum.com, accessed November 28, 2025.
- B. Collins, S. Matsumoto, and J. Novak, The Weingarten calculus, Not. Am. Math. Soc. 69, 734 (2022).
- W. R. Clements, P. C. Humphreys, B. J. Metcalf, W. S. Kolthammer, and I. A. Walmsley, Optimal design for universal multiport interferometers, Optica 3, 1460 (2016).
- C. Taballione, R. van der Meer, H. J. Snijders, P. Hooijschuur, J. P. Epping, M. de Goede, B. Kassenberg, P. Venderbosch, C. Toebes, and H. van den Vlekkert, A universal fully reconfigurable 12-mode quantum photonic processor, Mater. Quantum Technol. 1, 035002 (2021).
- C. Taballione, T. A. W. Wolterink, J. Lugani, A. Eckstein, B. A. Bell, R. Grootjans, I. Visscher, D. Geskus, C. G. H. Roeloffzen, J. J. Renema, I. A. Walmsley, P. W. H. Pinkse, and K.-J. Boller, 8 × 8 reconfigurable quantum photonic processor based on silicon nitride waveguides, Opt. Express 27, 26842 (2019).
- R. Jozsa, Fidelity for mixed quantum states, J. Mod. Opt. 41, 2315 (1994).
- M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Information and Quantum Computation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
- A. Strikis, S. C. Benjamin, and B. J. Brown, Quantum computing is scalable on a planar array of qubits with fabrication defects, Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 064081 (2023).
- F. Mezzadri, How to generate random matrices from the classical compact groups, Not. Am. Math. Soc. 54, 592 (2007).