Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Preparing quantum backflow states by large momentum transfer

Yuchong Chen and Yijun Tang*

  • *Contact author: yjtphy@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. A 113, 063304 – Published 1 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/3b4f-6nfr

Abstract

Quantum backflow refers to the appearance of negative probability current in a state whose momentum distribution is essentially positive. We propose a scheme to prepare such states in a noninteracting Bose-Einstein condensate using large-momentum-transfer (LMT) atom interferometry. Our approach extends the single-pulse proposal of Palmero et al. [Phys. Rev. A 87, 053618 (2013)] by allowing one interferometer arm to undergo a tunable sequence of momentum-transfer pulses before recombination with a freely propagating arm. For realistic parameters for Sr88, the protocol generates interference states with tunable probability current and negligible negative-momentum contamination. We evaluate both the probability current and the critical-density criterion introduced by Palmero et al. [Phys. Rev. A 87, 053618 (2013)], and identify parameter regimes in which the backflow signature is enhanced relative to the single-pulse scheme. These results present LMT interferometry as a flexible route for preparing candidate quantum-backflow states in cold-atom experiments.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (31)

  1. G. R. Allcock, The time of arrival in quantum mechanics II. The individual measurement, Ann. Phys. 53, 286 (1969).
  2. A. J. Bracken and G. F. Melloy, Probability backflow and a new dimensionless quantum number, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 27, 2197 (1994).
  3. C. J. Fewster and H. J. Kirk-Karakaya, Repeated quantum backflow and overflow, Proc. R. Soc. A 481, 2328 (2025).
  4. M. Penz, G. Grübl, S. Kreidl, and P. Wagner, A new approach to quantum backflow, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39, 423 (2006).
  5. M. V. Berry, Quantum backflow, negative kinetic energy, and optical retro-propagation, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 43, 415302 (2010).
  6. W. van Dijk and F. M. Toyama, Decay of a quasistable quantum system and quantum backflow, Phys. Rev. A 100, 052101 (2019).
  7. P. Strange, Large quantum probability backflow and the azimuthal angle–angular momentum uncertainty relation for an electron in a constant magnetic field, Eur. J. Phys. 33, 1147 (2012).
  8. A. Goussev, Quantum backflow in a ring, Phys. Rev. A 103, 022217 (2021).
  9. A. Goussev, F. Quinque, J. Joo, and A. Burbanks, Quantum backflow current in a ring: Optimal bounds and fractality, Phys. Rev. A 110, 022216 (2024).
  10. M. Barbier, A. Goussev, and S. C. L. Srivastava, Unbounded quantum backflow in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. A 107, 032204 (2023).
  11. V. D. Paccoia, O. Panella, and P. Roy, Angular momentum quantum backflow in the noncommutative plane, Phys. Rev. A 102, 062218 (2020).
  12. S. V. Mousavi and S. Miret-Artés, Dissipative quantum backflow, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135, 324 (2020).
  13. S. V. Mousavi and S. Miret-Artés, Quantum backflow for dissipative two-identical-particle systems, Results Phys. 19, 103426 (2020).
  14. S. Mousavi and S. Miret-Artés, Erratum to: Dissipative quantum backflow, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135, 654 (2020).
  15. H. Bostelmann, D. Cadamuro, and G. Lechner, Quantum backflow and scattering, Phys. Rev. A 96, 012112 (2017).
  16. A. H. de Vasconcelos Junior, Quantum backflow in the presence of defects, Ph.D. thesis, University of York, 2021.
  17. M. Barbier, Quantum backflow for many-particle systems, Phys. Rev. A 102, 023334 (2020).
  18. M. Barbier and A. Goussev, Quantum backflow for two identical particles, New J. Phys. 27, 033011 (2025).
  19. A. Goussev and G. V. Morozov, Searching for Bloch wave packets with almost definite momentum direction, Phys. Rev. A 112, 032223 (2025).
  20. Sh. Mardonov, M. Palmero, M. Modugno, E. Ya. Sherman, and J. G. Muga, Interference of spin-orbit–coupled Bose-Einstein condensates, Europhys. Lett. 106, 60004 (2014).
  21. M. Palmero, E. Torrontegui, J. G. Muga, and M. Modugno, Detecting quantum backflow by the density of a Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A 87, 053618 (2013).
  22. M. Barbier and A. Goussev, On the experiment-friendly formulation of quantum backflow, Quantum 5, 536, (2021).
  23. M. Miller, W. C. Yuan, R. Dumke, and T. Paterek, Experiment-friendly formulation of quantum backflow, Quantum, 5, 379 (2021).
  24. Y. Eliezer, T. Zacharias, and A. Bahabad, Observation of optical backflow, Optica 7, 72 (2020).
  25. A. Daniel, B. Ghosh, B. Gorzkowski, and R. Lapkiewicz, Demonstrating backflow in classical two beams' interference, New J. Phys. 24, 123011 (2022).
  26. B. Ghosh, A. Daniel, B. Gorzkowski, and R. Lapkiewicz, Azimuthal backflow in light carrying orbital angular momentum, Optica 10, 1217 (2023).
  27. Z.-F. Zhang, P.-F. Huang, S.-C. Dong, Y.-X. Rong, J.-S. Xu, Y.-J. Gu, and Y. Xiao, Observation of single-photon azimuthal backflow with weak measurement, Opt. Lett. 50, 333 (2025).
  28. T. Paterek and A. Goussev, General quantum backflow in realistic wave packets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 090202 (2026).
  29. S. Dimopoulos, P. W. Graham, J. M. Hogan, and M. A. Kasevich, General relativistic effects in atom interferometry, Phys. Rev. D 78, 042003 (2008).
  30. J. Rudolph, T. Wilkason, M. Nantel, H. Swan, C. M. Holland, Y. Jiang, B. E. Garber, S. P. Carman, and J. M. Hogan, Large momentum transfer clock atom interferometry on the 689 nm intercombination line of strontium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 083604 (2020).
  31. S. Stellmer, F. Schreck, and T. C Killian, Degenerate Quantum Gases of Strontium (World Scientific, Singapore, 2013).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation