- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review A

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Perspective
  • Open Access

Towards the time-resolved spectroscopy of photoinduced electron dynamics in nuclear transitions

Marc Seitz1, Francesca Calegari1,2,3, Peter G. Thirolf4, and Andrea Trabattoni1,5,6

PDF

Phys. Rev. A 112, 040101 – Published 8 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/31qf-pfvj

Abstract

The interaction between nuclear and electronic states plays a fundamental role in many nuclear processes. While such nucleus-electron couplings have been extensively studied using nuclear physics methodologies, recent advancements in light sources have introduced novel schemes for nuclear photoexcitation. This breakthrough enables a new class of experiments that could revolutionize our understanding and control of nuclear states. In this work, we review the research on electron processes associated with nuclear transitions, and the light sources that have been used for nuclear photoexcitation. Furthermore, we explore the potential for establishing time-resolved spectroscopy of electron-nucleus couplings, drawing connections to state-of-the-art light sources and time-resolved studies in atomic and molecular physics. By addressing both challenges and opportunities, we aim to provide a roadmap for future research in this interdisciplinary field. This emerging platform, linking nuclear science, atomic physics, and photonics, holds great promise for driving groundbreaking scientific and technological advancements.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (340)

  1. D. Nolfi-Donegan, A. Braganza, and S. Shiva, Mitochondrial electron transport chain: Oxidative phosphorylation, oxidant production, and methods of measurement, Redox Biology 37, 101674 (2020).
  2. C. C. Moser et al., Nature of biological electron transfer, Nature (London) 355, 796 (1992).
  3. R. Croce and H. van Amerongen, Natural strategies for photosynthetic light harvesting, Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 492 (2014).
  4. A. Aldahan et al., Atmospheric impact on beryllium isotopes as solar activity proxy, Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, 2008GL035189 (2008).
  5. M. Alotby et al., Measurement of the intensity ratio of auger and conversion electrons for the electron capture decay of I125, Phys. Med. Biol. 63, 06NT04 (2018).
  6. M. Alotiby et al., Quantitative electron spectroscopy of I125 over an extended energy range, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 232, 73 (2019).
  7. J. Thielking et al., Laser spectroscopic characterization of the nuclear-clock isomer 229mth, Nature (London) 556, 321 (2018).
  8. E. Peik and M. Okhapkin, Nuclear clocks based on resonant excitation of γ-transitions, C. R. Phys. 16, 516 (2015).
  9. E. Peik et al., Nuclear clocks for testing fundamental physics, Quantum Sci. Technol. 6, 034002 (2021).
  10. K. Beeks et al., The thorium-229 low-energy isomer and the nuclear clock, Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 238 (2021).
  11. N. Dimarcq et al., Roadmap towards the redefinition of the second, Metrologia 61, 012001 (2024).
  12. J. Kromdijk et al., Improving photosynthesis and crop productivity by accelerating recovery from photoprotection, Science 354, 857 (2016).
  13. M. Mitrano et al., Possible light-induced superconductivity in K3C60 at high temperature, Nature (London) 530, 461 (2016).
  14. A. Zong et al., Emerging ultrafast techniques for studying quantum materials, Nat. Rev. Mater. 8, 224 (2023).
  15. H.-T. Chen, A. J. Taylor, and N. Yu, A review of metasurfaces: Physics and applications, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 076401 (2016).
  16. S. Matinyan, Lasers as a bridge between atomic and nuclear physics, Phys. Rep. 298, 199 (1998).
  17. M. Maiuri, M. Garavelli, and G. Cerullo, Ultrafast spectroscopy: State of the art and open challenges, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 3 (2020).
  18. R. L. Mössbauer, Kernresonanzfluoreszenz von Gammastrahlung in Ir191, Z. Phys. 151, 124 (1958).
  19. P. P. Craig et al., Nuclear resonance absorption of gamma rays in Ir191, Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 221 (1959).
  20. S. I. Aksenov et al., Observation of resonance absorption of gamma rays in zn67, Sov. Phys.–JETP 13, 62 (1961).
  21. C. Alff and G. K. Wertheim, Hyperfine structure of Fe57 in yttrium-iron garnet from the Mössbauer effect, Phys. Rev. 122, 1414 (1961).
  22. W. Decking et al., A MHz-repetition-rate hard x-ray free-electron laser driven by a superconducting linear accelerator, Nat. Photon. 14, 391 (2020).
  23. J. Tiedau et al., Laser excitation of the Th-229 nucleus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 182501 (2024).
  24. R. Elwell, C. Schneider, J. Jeet, J. E. S. Terhune, H. W. T. Morgan, A. N. Alexandrova, H. B. TranTan, A. Derevianko, and E. R. Hudson, Laser excitation of the Th229 nuclear isomeric transition in a solid-state host, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 013201 (2024).
  25. C. Zhang et al., Frequency ratio of the 229mth nuclear isomeric transition and the Sr87 atomic clock, Nature (London) 633, 63 (2024).
  26. S. Kraemer et al., Observation of the radiative decay of the Th229 nuclear clock isomer, Nature (London) 617, 706 (2023).
  27. R. Schwengner et al., Photoexcitation of Ge76, Phys. Rev. C 105, 024303 (2022).
  28. U. Kneissl, H. H. Pitz, and A. Zilges, Investigation of nuclear structure by resonance fluorescence scattering, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 37, 349 (1996).
  29. A. Büchner et al., The ELBE-project at Dresden-Rossendorf, in Proceedings of EPAC 2000 (JACoW, Vienna, 2000).
  30. A. Makinaga et al., Dipole strength of Ta181 for the evaluation of the Ta180 stellar neutron capture rate, Phys. Rev. C 90, 044301 (2014).
  31. R. Massarczyk, G. Rusev, R. Schwengner, F. Donau, C. Bhatia, M. E. Gooden, J. H. Kelley, A. P. Tonchev, and W. Tornow, Magnetic dipole strength in Xe128 and Xe134 in the spin-flip resonance region, Phys. Rev. C 90, 054310 (2014).
  32. A. Makinaga et al., Dipole strength in Se80 for s process and nuclear transmutation of Se79, Phys. Rev. C 94, 044304 (2016).
  33. T. Shizuma et al., Dipole strength distribution in Pb206 for the evaluation of the neutron-capture cross section of Pb205, Phys. Rev. C 98, 064317 (2018).
  34. R. Schwengner et al., Electric and magnetic dipole strength in Zn66, Phys. Rev. C 103, 024312 (2021).
  35. X. Li, M. W. Ahmed, A. Banu, C. Bartram, B. Crowe, E. J. Downie, M. Emamian, G. Feldman, H. Gao et al., Compton scattering from He4 at the TUNL HIγS facility, Phys. Rev. C 101, 034618 (2020).
  36. R. C. Runkle, A. E. Champagne, C. Angulo, C. Fox, C. Iliadis, R. Longland, and J. Pollanen, Direct measurement of the N14(p,γ)O15 S factor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 082503 (2005).
  37. S. Gales et al., The extreme light infrastructure—nuclear physics (ELI-NP) facility: New horizons in physics with 10 PW ultra-intense lasers and 20 MeV brilliant gamma beams, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 094301 (2018).
  38. V. Iancu et al., Brilliant gamma beams for industrial applications: New opportunities, new challenges, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 763, 012003 (2016).
  39. M. Bobeica et al., Radioisotope production for medical applications at ELI-NP, Rom. Rep. Phys. 68, S847 (2016).
  40. D. Budker et al., Expanding nuclear physics horizons with the gamma factory, Ann. Phys. 534, 2100284 (2022).
  41. D. Budker et al., Atomic physics studies at the gamma factory at CERN, Ann. Phys. 532, 2000204 (2020).
  42. V. Potapkin et al., The Fe57 synchrotron Mössbauer source at the ESRF, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 19, 559 (2012).
  43. T. Mitsui et al., Development of an energy-domain Fe57-Mössbauer spectrometer using synchrotron radiation and its application to ultrahigh-pressure studies with a diamond anvil cell, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 16, 723 (2009).
  44. H.-C. Wille et al., Nuclear resonant scattering at PETRA III: Brillant opportunities for nano – and extreme condition science, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 217, 012008 (2010).
  45. P. Gütlich et al., Mössbauer spectroscopy—an indispensable tool in solid state research, Spectroscopy Europe/World 24, 21 (2012).
  46. W. Sturhahn, K. W. Quast, T. S. Toellner, E. E. Alp, J. Metge, and E. Gerdau, Electron emission from Fe57 nuclei excited with synchrotron radiation, Phys. Rev. B 53, 171 (1996).
  47. T. Kawauchi et al., Observation of internal-conversion electrons induced by inelastic nuclear resonant scattering, Appl. Surf. Sci. 256, 962 (2009).
  48. M. Seto et al., Observation of nuclear resonant scattering accompanied by phonon excitation using synchrotron radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3828 (1995).
  49. R. Röhlsberger, Nuclear Condensed Matter Physics with Synchrotron Radiation: Basic Principles, Methodology and Applications (Springer, New York, 2004), Vol. 208.
  50. T. Masuda et al., X-ray pumping of the Th229 nuclear clock isomer, Nature (London) 573, 238 (2019).
  51. P. Emma et al., First lasing and operation of an ångstrom-wavelength free-electron laser, Nat. Photon. 4, 641 (2010).
  52. A. M. Kondratenko and E. L. Saldin, Generation of coherent radiation by a relativistic electron beam in an undulator, Particle Accelerators 10, 207 (1980).
  53. C. Pellegrini, A 4 to 0.1 nm FEL based on the SLAC linac, Proceedings of the Workshop on Fourth Generation Light Sources, SSRL/SLAC Report, Vol. 92, No. 02 (1992), pp. 364–375.
  54. T. Ishikawa et al., A compact x-ray free-electron laser emitting in the sub-ångström region, Nat. Photon. 6, 540 (2012).
  55. C. Pellegrini, A. Marinelli, and S. Reiche, The physics of x-ray free-electron lasers, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 015006 (2016).
  56. K. P. Heeg et al., Spectral narrowing of x-ray pulses for precision spectroscopy with nuclear resonances, Science 357, 375 (2017).
  57. Y. Shvyd'ko et al., Resonant x-ray excitation of the nuclear clock isomer Sc45, Nature (London) 622, 471 (2023).
  58. L. von der Wense et al., Direct detection of the Th229 nuclear clock transition, Nature (London) 533, 47 (2016).
  59. P. G. Thirolf, B. Seiferle, and L. von der Wense, Improving our knowledge on the 229mthorium isomer: Toward a test bench for time variations of fundamental constants, Ann. Phys. 531, 1800381 (2019).
  60. R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics, 4th ed. (Academic, New York, 2020).
  61. C. Li, Nonlinear Optics (Springer, Berlin, 2017).
  62. F. Belli et al., Highly efficient deep UV generation by four-wave mixing in gas-filled hollow-core photonic crystal fiber, Opt. Lett. 44, 5509 (2019).
  63. T. Togashi et al., Generation of vacuum-ultraviolet light by an optically contacted, prism-coupled KBe2BO3F2 crystal, Opt. Lett. 28, 254 (2003).
  64. C. T. Chen, G. L. Wang, X. Y. Wang, and Z. Y. Xu, Deep-UV nonlinear optical crystal KBe2BO3F2-discovery, growth, optical properties and applications, Appl. Phys. B 97, 9 (2009).
  65. R. Hilbig and R. Wallenstein, Tunable VUV radiation generated by two-photon resonant frequency mixing in xenon, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 19, 194 (1983).
  66. A. Tünnermann et al., Generation of tunable short pulse VUV radiation by four-wave mixing in xenon with femtosecond KrF-excimer laser pulses, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 29, 1233 (1993).
  67. S. J. Hanna et al., A new broadly tunable (7.4–10.2 eV) laser based VUV light source and its first application to aerosol mass spectrometry, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 279, 134 (2009).
  68. J. Thielking et al., Vacuum-ultraviolet laser source for spectroscopy of trapped thorium ions, New J. Phys. 25, 083026 (2023).
  69. B. Seiferle et al., Energy of the Th229 nuclear clock transition, Nature (London) 573, 243 (2019).
  70. T. Sikorsky et al., Measurement of the Th229 isomer energy with a magnetic microcalorimeter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 142503 (2020).
  71. G. C. Bjorklund, Effects of focusing on third-order nonlinear processes in isotropic media, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 11, 287 (1975).
  72. M. H. Hutchinson and K. J. Thomas, High-efficiency generation of narrow bandwidth tunable VUV radiation, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 19, 1823 (1983).
  73. R. Forbes et al., Efficient (∼10%) generation of vacuum ultraviolet femtosecond pulses via four-wave mixing in hollow-core fibers, Opt. Lett. 49, 3178 (2024).
  74. P. B. Corkum, Plasma perspective on strong field multiphoton ionization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1994 (1993).
  75. K. J. Schafer, B. Yang, L. F. DiMauro, and K. C. Kulander, Above threshold ionization beyond the high harmonic cutoff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1599 (1993).
  76. M. Nisoli et al., Attosecond electron dynamics in molecules, Chem. Rev. 117, 10760 (2017).
  77. A. Cingöz et al., Direct frequency comb spectroscopy in the extreme ultraviolet, Nature (London) 482, 68 (2012).
  78. C. Zhang et al., Tunable VUV frequency comb for 229mth nuclear spectroscopy, Opt. Lett. 47, 5591 (2022).
  79. S. A. Diddams et al., Optical frequency combs: Coherently uniting the electromagnetic spectrum, Science 369, eaay3676 (2020).
  80. A. Baltuška, T. Fuji, and T. Kobayashi, Controlling the carrier-envelope phase of ultrashort light pulses with optical parametric amplifiers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 133901 (2002).
  81. Y. Lee et al., Novel method for carrier-envelope-phase stabilization of femtosecond laser pulses, Opt. Express 13, 2969 (2005).
  82. J.-F. Hergott et al., Carrier-envelope phase stabilization of a 20 W, grating based, chirped-pulse amplified laser, using electro-optic effect in a LiNbO3 crystal, Opt. Express 19, 19935 (2011).
  83. H. R. Telle et al., Carrier-envelope offset phase control: A novel concept for absolute optical frequency measurement and ultrashort pulse generation, Appl. Phys. B 69, 327 (1999).
  84. T. Consortium, The thorium nuclear clock project (2020).
  85. P. G. Thirolf, S. Kraemer, D. Moritz, and K. Scharl, The thorium isomer 229mth: Review of status and perspectives after more than 50 years of research, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 233, 1113 (2024).
  86. M. Nisoli, S. D. Silvestri, and O. Svelto, Generation of high energy 10 fs pulses by a new pulse compression technique, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 2793 (1996).
  87. J. M. Dudley, G. Genty, and S. Coen, Supercontinuum generation in photonic crystal fiber, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 1135 (2006).
  88. R. Sollapur et al., Resonance-enhanced multi-octave supercontinuum generation in antiresonant hollow-core fibers, Light: Sci. Applicat. 6, e17124 (2017).
  89. J. C. Travers, T. Grigorova, C. Brahms, and F. Belli, High-energy pulse self-compression and ultraviolet generation through soliton dynamics in hollow capillary fibres, Nat. Photon. 13, 547 (2019).
  90. C. Brahms, F. Belli, and J. C. Travers, Resonant dispersive wave emission in hollow capillary fibers filled with pressure gradients, Opt. Lett. 45, 4456 (2020).
  91. T. Grigorova, C. Brahms, F. F. Belli, and J. C. Travers, Dispersion tuning of nonlinear optical pulse dynamics in gas-filled hollow capillary fibers, Phys. Rev. A 107, 063512 (2023).
  92. L. Allen, M. W. Beijersbergen, R. J. C. Spreeuw, and J. P. Woerdman, Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes, Phys. Rev. A 45, 8185 (1992).
  93. S. Franke-Arnold, Optical angular momentum and atoms, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 375, 20150435 (2017).
  94. K. Y. Bliokh, F. J. Rodriguez-Fortuno, F. Nori, and A. V. Zayats, Spin–orbit interactions of light, Nat. Photon. 9, 796 (2015).
  95. H. M. Scholz-Marggraf, S. Fritzsche, V. G. Serbo, A. Afanasev, and A. Surzhykov, Absorption of twisted light by hydrogenlike atoms, Phys. Rev. A 90, 013425 (2014).
  96. A. Surzhykov, D. Seipt, V. G. Serbo, and S. Fritzsche, Interaction of twisted light with many-electron atoms and ions, Phys. Rev. A 91, 013403 (2015).
  97. S. A.-L. Schulz, A. A. Peshkov, R. A. Muller, R. Lange, N. Huntemann, C. Tamm, E. Peik, and A. Surzhykov, Generalized excitation of atomic multipole transitions by twisted light modes, Phys. Rev. A 102, 012812 (2020).
  98. T. Kirschbaum, T. Schumm, and A. Pálffy, Photoexcitation of the Th229 nuclear clock transition using twisted light, Phys. Rev. C 110, 064326 (2024).
  99. M. Solyanik-Gorgone et al., Excitation of E1-forbidden atomic transitions with electric, magnetic, or mixed multipolarity in light fields carrying orbital and spin angular momentum [invited], J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 36, 565 (2019).
  100. L. von der Wense and B. Seiferle, The Th229 isomer: Prospects for a nuclear optical clock, Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 277 (2020).
  101. S. J. Herr et al., Fanout periodic poling of BaMgF4 crystals, Opt. Mater. Express 13, 2158 (2023).
  102. V. S. Malinovsky and J. L. Krause, General theory of population transfer by adiabatic rapid passage with intense, chirped laser pulses, Eur. Phys. J. D 14, 147 (2001).
  103. T. Kirschbaum, N. Minkov, and A. Pálffy, Nuclear coherent population transfer to the Th229 isomer using x-ray pulses, Phys. Rev. C 105, 064313 (2022).
  104. E. Kuznetsova, G. Liu, and S. A. Malinovskaya, Adiabatic rapid passage two-photon excitation of a Rydberg atom, Phys. Scr. 2014, 014024 (2014).
  105. K. Li, D. C. Spierings, and A. M. Steinberg, Efficient adiabatic rapid passage in the presence of noise, Phys. Rev. A 108, 012615 (2023).
  106. N. Chanda, P. Patnaik, and R. Bhattacharyya, Optimal population transfer using adiabatic rapid passage in the presence of drive-induced dissipation, Phys. Rev. A 107, 063708 (2023).
  107. T. J. Bürvenich, J. Evers, and C. H. Keitel, Nuclear quantum optics with x-ray laser pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 142501 (2006).
  108. T. J. Bürvenich, J. Evers, and C. H. Keitel, Dynamic nuclear stark shift in superintense laser fields, Phys. Rev. C 74, 044601 (2006).
  109. W.-T. Liao, A. Palffy, and C. H. Keitel, Nuclear coherent population transfer with x-ray laser pulses, Phys. Lett. B 705, 134 (2011).
  110. K. Beeks et al., Growth and characterization of thorium-doped calcium fluoride single crystals, Sci. Rep. 13, 3897 (2023).
  111. R. Röhlsberger, H.-C. Wille, K. Schlage, and B. Sahoo, Electromagnetically induced transparency with resonant nuclei in a cavity, Nature (London) 482, 199 (2012).
  112. M. E. Rose, Internal conversion theory, in Internal Conversion Processes, edited by J. H. Hamilton (Academic Press, New York, 1966), Chap. II, pp. 15–33.
  113. T. Kibédi et al., Evaluation of theoretical conversion coefficients using BrIcC, Phys. Res. A 589, 202 (2008).
  114. C. J. Campbell, A. G. Radnaev, A. Kuzmich, V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, and A. Derevianko, Single-ion nuclear clock for metrology at the 19th decimal place, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 120802 (2012).
  115. E. Peik and C. Tamm, Nuclear laser spectroscopy of the 3.5 eV transition in Th-229, Europhys. Lett. 61, 181 (2003).
  116. E. V. Tkalya, Proposal for a nuclear gamma-ray laser of optical range, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 162501 (2011).
  117. W.-T. Liao, S. Das, C. H. Keitel, and A. Palffy, Coherence-enhanced optical determination of the Th229 isomeric transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 262502 (2012).
  118. P. Borisyuk et al., Band structure and decay channels of thorium-229 low-lying isomeric state for ensemble of thorium atoms adsorbed on calcium fluoride, Phys. Status Solidi C 12, 1333 (2015).
  119. E. V. Tkalya, A. N. Zherikhin, and V. I. Zhudov, Decay of the low-energy nuclear isomer Thm229 (3/2+, 3.5±1.0 eV) in solids, dielectrics and metals: A new scheme of experimental research, Phys. Rev. C 61, 064308 (2000).
  120. F. F. Karpeshin and M. B. Trzhaskovskaya, Impact of the electron environment on the lifetime of the Thm229 low-lying isomer, Phys. Rev. C 76, 054313 (2007).
  121. V. F. Strizhov and E. V. Tkalya, Decay channel of low-lying isomer state of the Th229 nucleus. Possibilities of experimental investigation, Sov. Phys. JETP 72, 387 (1991).
  122. P. V. Bilous, G. A. Kazakov, I. D. Moore, T. Schumm, and A. Palffy, Internal conversion from excited electronic states of Th229 ions, Phys. Rev. A 95, 032503 (2017).
  123. F. F. Karpeshin and M. B. Trzhaskovskaya, Bound internal conversion versus nuclear excitation by electron transition: Revision of the theory of optical pumping of the 229mth isomer, Phys. Rev. C 95, 034310 (2017).
  124. S. G. Johnson et al., Resonance ionization mass spectrometry of thorium: Determination of the autoionization level structure and a re-determination of the ionization potential, Spectrochim. Acta Part B: Atomic Spectrosc. 47, 633 (1992).
  125. S. Köhler et al., Determination of the first ionization potential of actinide elements by resonance ion-ization mass spectroscopy, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B: Atom.c Spectrosc. 52, 717 (1997).
  126. NIST, NIST atomic spectra database ionization energies form (2025), https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/ASD/ionEnergy.html.
  127. B. Seiferle, L. von der Wense, and P. G. Thirolf, Lifetime measurement of the Th229 nuclear isomer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 042501 (2017).
  128. F. Karpeshin, Resonance internal conversion as a way of accelerating nuclear processes, Phys. Part. Nuclei 37, 284 (2006).
  129. H. Zhang and X. Wang, Theory of isomeric excitation of Th229 via electronic processes, Front. Phys. 11, 1166566 (2023).
  130. E. V. Tkalya, Probability of nonradiative excitation of nuclei in transitions of an electron in an atomic shell, Sov. Phys.–JETP 75, 200 (1992).
  131. S. G. Porsev and V. V. Flambaum, Electronic bridge process in Th+229, Phys. Rev. A 81, 042516 (2010).
  132. S. G. Porsev, V. V. Flambaum, E. Peik, and C. Tamm, Excitation of the isomeric 229mth nuclear state via an electronic bridge process in Th+229, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 182501 (2010).
  133. P. V. Bilous, E. Peik, and A. Pálffy, Laser-induced electronic bridge for characterization of the 229mth → 229gth nuclear transition with a tunable optical laser, New J. Phys. 20, 013016 (2018).
  134. A. Y. Dzyublik, Excitation of 229mth in the electron bridge via continuum, as a scattering process, Phys. Rev. C 102, 024604 (2020).
  135. P. Bilous, H. Bekker, J. C. Berengut, B. Seiferle, L. von der Wense, P. G. Thirolf, T. Pfeifer, J. R. Crespo Lopez-Urrutia, and A. Palffy, Electronic bridge excitation in highly charged Th229 ions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 192502 (2020).
  136. B. S. Nickerson, M. Pimon, P. V. Bilous, J. Gugler, K. Beeks, T. Sikorsky, P. Mohn, T. Schumm, and A. Palffy, Nuclear excitation of the Th229 isomer via defect states in doped crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 032501 (2020).
  137. E. V. Tkalya, Excitation of 229mth at inelastic scattering of low energy electrons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 242501 (2020).
  138. H. Zhang, W. Wang, and X. Wang, Nuclear excitation cross section of Th229 via inelastic electron scattering, Phys. Rev. C 106, 044604 (2022).
  139. E. V. Tkalya, Cross section of the Coulomb excitation of Th229 by low energy muons, Chin. Phys. C 45, 094102 (2021).
  140. W. Wang, J. Zhou, B. Liu, and X. Wang, Exciting the isomeric Th229 nuclear state via laser-driven electron recollision, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 052501 (2021).
  141. W. Wang, H. Zhang, and X. Wang, Strong-field atomic physics meets Th229 nuclear physics, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 54, 244001 (2021).
  142. X. Wang, Nuclear excitation of Th229 induced by laser-driven electron recollision, Phys. Rev. C 106, 024606 (2022).
  143. D. Lentrodt, C. H. Keitel, and J. Evers, Towards nonlinear optics with Mössbauer nuclei using x-ray cavities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 033801 (2025).
  144. G. C. Baldwin, J. C. Solem, and V. I. Gol'danskii, Approaches to the development of gamma-ray lasers, Rev. Mod. Phys. 53, 687 (1981).
  145. R. L. Mössbauer, Recoilless nuclear resonance absorption of gamma radiation, Science 137, 731 (1962).
  146. O. Kocharovskaya, Amplification and lasing without inversion, Phys. Rep. 219, 175 (1992).
  147. G. C. Baldwin and J. C. Solem, Recoilless gamma-ray lasers, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 1085 (1997).
  148. R. Röhlsberger et al., Collective lamb shift in single-photon superradiance, Science 328, 1248 (2010).
  149. K. P. Heeg et al., Vacuum-assisted generation and control of atomic coherences at x-ray energies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 073601 (2013).
  150. K. P. Heeg et al., Interferometric phase detection at x-ray energies via Fano resonance control, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 207401 (2015).
  151. K. P. Heeg et al., Tunable subluminal propagation of narrow-band x-ray pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 203601 (2015).
  152. J. Haber, K. Schulze, K. Schlage et al., Collective strong coupling of x-rays and nuclei in a nuclear optical lattice, Nat. Photon. 10, 445 (2016).
  153. J. Haber, X. Kong, C. Strohm et al., Rabi oscillations of x-ray radiation between two nuclear ensembles, Nat. Photon. 11, 720 (2017).
  154. F. Vagizov et al., Coherent control of the waveforms of recoilless gamma-ray photons, Nature (London) 508, 80 (2014).
  155. I. Georgescu, The first decade of XFELs, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 345 (2020).
  156. I. Matsuda and R. Arafune, Nonlinear X-ray Spectroscopy for Materials Science, Springer Series in Optical Sciences, Vol. 246 (Springer, Berlin, 2023).
  157. N. Rohringer, X-ray raman scattering: A building block for nonlinear spectroscopy, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 377, 20170471 (2019).
  158. S. Sofer et al., Quantum enhanced x-ray detection, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031033 (2019).
  159. S. Nandi et al., Observation of Rabi dynamics with a short-wavelength free-electron laser, Nature (London) 608, 488 (2022).
  160. G. Doumy et al., Nonlinear atomic response to intense ultrashort x rays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 083002 (2011).
  161. N. Rohringer et al., Atomic inner-shell x-ray laser at 1.46 nanometres pumped by an x-ray free-electron laser, Nature (London) 481, 488 (2012).
  162. M. Kalvius and P. Kienle, The Rudolf Mössbauer Story: His Scientific Work and its Impact on Science and History (Springer, Berlin, 2012).
  163. Y. Yoshida and G. Langouche, Modern Mössbauer Spectroscopy, Topics in Applied Physics (Springer, Singapore, 2021).
  164. R. Röhlsberger and J. Evers, Quantum optical phenomena in nuclear resonant scattering, in Modern Mössbauer Spectroscopy: New Challenges Based on Cutting-Edge Techniques, edited by Y. Yoshida and G. Langouche (Springer, Singapore, 2021), pp. 105–171.
  165. L. Wolff and J. Evers, Characterization and detection method for x-ray excitation of Mössbauer nuclei beyond the low-excitation regime, Phys. Rev. A 108, 043714 (2023).
  166. M. Fleischhauer, A. Imamoglu, and J. P. Marangos, Electromagnetically induced transparency: Optics in coherent media, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 633 (2005).
  167. C. Buth, R. Santra, and L. Young, Electromagnetically induced transparency for x-rays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 253001 (2007).
  168. T. Glover et al., Controlling x-rays with light, Nat. Phys. 6, 69 (2010).
  169. R. E. Holland, F. J. Lynch, and K. E. Nystén, Lifetimes of d3/2 hole states in scandium isotopes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 241 (1964).
  170. S. Liu et al., Cascaded hard x-ray self-seeded free-electron laser at megahertz repetition rate, Nat. Photon. 17, 984 (2023).
  171. V. Goldanskii and V. Namiot, On the excitation of isomeric nuclear levels by laser radiation through inverse internal electron conversion, Phys. Lett. B 62, 393 (1976).
  172. A. Pálffy, Nuclear effects in atomic transitions, Contemp. Phys. 51, 471 (2010).
  173. N. Cue, J.-C. Poizat, and J. Remillieux, Exciting the nucleus by target electron capture into atomic orbitals, Europhys. Lett. 8, 19 (1989).
  174. P. Walker and G. Dracoulis, Energy traps in atomic nuclei, Nature (London) 399, 35 (1999).
  175. P. Walker and J. Carroll, Ups and downs of nuclear isomers, Phys. Today 58(6), 39 (2005).
  176. A. Zadernovsky and J. Carroll, Non-radiative triggering of long-lived nuclear isomers, Hyperfine Interact. 143, 153 (2002).
  177. J. Carroll and C. Chiara, Isomer depletion, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 233, 1151 (2024).
  178. J. Zhao, A. Pálffy, C. H. Keitel, and Y. Wu, Efficient production of 229mth via nuclear excitation by electron capture, Phys. Rev. C 110, 014330 (2024).
  179. J. Qi, H. Zhang, and X. Wang, Isomeric excitation of Th229 in laser-heated clusters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 112501 (2023).
  180. K. Słabkowska, L. Syrocki, M. Polasik, J. J. Carroll, C. J. Chiara, and J. Rzadkiewicz, Dominant magnetic-dipole nuclear excitation by electron capture in a beam-based scenario for the 84mRb isomer, Phys. Rev. C 109, 054327 (2024).
  181. C. Chiara et al., Isomer depletion as experimental evidence of nuclear excitation by electron capture, Nature (London) 554, 216 (2018).
  182. Y. Wu, C. H. Keitel, and A. Pálffy, 93mMo isomer depletion via beam-based nuclear excitation by electron capture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 212501 (2019).
  183. J. Rzadkiewicz, M. Polasik, K. Slabkowska, L. Syrocki, J. J. Carroll, and C. J. Chiara, Novel approach to 93mMo isomer depletion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 042501 (2021).
  184. J. Rzadkiewicz et al., 93mMo isomer depletion via nuclear excitation by electron capture in resonant transfer into highly excited open-shell atomic states, Phys. Rev. C 108, L031302 (2023).
  185. X. Z. S. Guo, Y. Fang, and C. Petrache, Possible overestimation of isomer depletion due to contamination, Nature (London) 594, E1 (2021).
  186. C. Chiara et al., Reply to: Possible overestimation of isomer depletion due to contamination, Nature (London) 594, E3 (2021).
  187. S. Guo et al., Probing 93mMo isomer depletion with an isomer beam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 242502 (2022).
  188. M. Morita, Nuclear excitation by electron transition and its application to uranium 235 separation, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 1574 (1973).
  189. S. Kishimoto, Y. Yoda, M. Seto, Y. Kobayashi, S. Kitao, R. Haruki, T. Kawauchi, K. Fukutani, and T. Okano, Observation of nuclear excitation by electron transition in Au197 with synchrotron x rays and an avalanche photodiode, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1831 (2000).
  190. I. Ahmad, R. W. Dunford, H. Esbensen, D. S. Gemmell, E. P. Kanter, U. Rutt, and S. H. Southworth, Nuclear excitation by electronic transition in Os189, Phys. Rev. C 61, 051304(R) (2000).
  191. T. Saito et al., Nuclear excitation by electron transition (NEET) in Np237 following k-shell photoionization, Phys. Lett. B 92, 293 (1980).
  192. M. Harston, Analysis of probabilities for nuclear excitation by near-resonant electronic transitions, Nucl. Phys. A 690, 447 (2001).
  193. E. V. Tkalya, Factors responsible for the difference of the theoretical and experimental probability for nuclear excitation by electron transition, JETP Lett. 56, 131 (1992).
  194. E. V. Tkalya, Dynamical effect of finite nuclear size in the nuclear excitation process during electron transitions in an atomic shell, JETP 78, 239 (1994).
  195. G. Claverie et al., Search for nuclear excitation by electronic transition in U235, Phys. Rev. C 70, 044303 (2004).
  196. P. A. Chodash, J. T. Harke, E. B. Norman, S. C. Wilks, R. J. Casperson, S. E. Fisher, K. S. Holliday, J. R. Jeffries, and M. A. Wakeling, Nuclear excitation by electronic transition of U235, Phys. Rev. C 93, 034610 (2016).
  197. F. Karpeshin, I. Band, M. Trzhaskovskaya, and M. Listengarten, Optical pumping 229mth through NEET as a new effective way of producing nuclear isomers, Phys. Lett. B 372, 1 (1996).
  198. V. Krutov and V. Fomenko, Influence of electronic shell on gamma radiation of atomic nuclei, Ann. Phys. 476, 291 (1968).
  199. V. Krutov, On the theory of internal conversion. I, Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR (Phys. Ser.) 22, 159 (1958).
  200. V. Krutov and K. Müller, On the internal conversion theory. II. Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR (Phys. Ser.) 22, 168 (1958).
  201. D. Kekez, A. Ljubici, K. Pisk, and B. A. Logan, Nuclear deexcitation via the electronic-bridge mechanism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1366 (1985).
  202. D. Kekez, K. Pisk, A. Ljubicic, and B. A. Logan, Nuclear deexcitation via an inelastic electronic bridge, Phys. Rev. C 34, 1446 (1986).
  203. F. F. Karpeshin, I. M. Band, M. B. Trzhaskovskaya, and B. A. Zon, Study of Th229 through laser-induced resonance internal conversion, Phys. Lett. B 282, 267 (1992).
  204. S. G. Porsev and V. V. Flambaum, Effect of atomic electrons on the 7.6-eV nuclear transition in Th3+229, Phys. Rev. A 81, 032504 (2010).
  205. N. Q. Cai, G. Q. Zhang, C. B. Fu et al., Populating 229mth via two-photon electronic bridge mechanism, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 32, 59 (2021).
  206. L. Li, Z. Li, C. Wang et al., Scheme for the excitation of thorium-229 nuclei based on electronic bridge excitation, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34, 24 (2023).
  207. R. A. Müller, A. V. Volotka, S. Fritzsche, and A. Surzhykov, Theoretical analysis of the electron bridge process in Th3+229, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 408, 84 (2017).
  208. C. J. Campbell, A. G. Radnaev, and A. Kuzmich, Wigner crystals of Th229 for optical excitation of the nuclear isomer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 223001 (2011).
  209. L. Eisenbud, The formal properties of nuclear collisions, Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University, 1948.
  210. E. P. Wigner, Lower limit for the energy derivative of the scattering phase shift, Phys. Rev. 98, 145 (1955).
  211. F. T. Smith, Lifetime matrix in collision theory, Phys. Rev. 119, 2098 (1960).
  212. P.-M. Paul et al., Observation of a train of attosecond pulses from high harmonic generation, Science 292, 1689 (2001).
  213. J. Itatani, F. Quere, G. L. Yudin, M. Y. Ivanov, F. Krausz, and P. B. Corkum, Attosecond streak camera, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 173903 (2002).
  214. M. Drescher et al., X-ray pulses approaching the attosecond frontier, Science 291, 1923 (2001).
  215. R. Pazourek, S. Nagele, and J. Burgdörfer, Attosecond chronoscopy of photoemission, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 765 (2015).
  216. R. Trebino et al., Measuring ultrashort laser pulses in the time-frequency domain using frequency-resolved optical gating, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68, 3277 (1997).
  217. Y. Mairesse and F. Quéré, Frequency-resolved optical gating for complete reconstruction of attosecond bursts, Phys. Rev. A 71, 011401(R) (2005).
  218. Y. Mairesse et al., Attosecond synchronization of high-harmonic soft x-rays, Science 302, 1540 (2003).
  219. S. Kazamias and P. Balcou, Intrinsic chirp of attosecond pulses: Single-atom model versus experiment, Phys. Rev. A 69, 063416 (2004).
  220. S. Nagele et al., Time-resolved photoemission by attosecond streaking: Extraction of time information, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 44, 081001 (2011).
  221. J. Fuchs et al., Time delays from one-photon transitions in the continuum, Optica 7, 154 (2020).
  222. M. Schultze et al., Delay in photoemission, Science 328, 1658 (2010).
  223. K. Klünder, J. M. Dahlstrom, M. Gisselbrecht, T. Fordell, M. Swoboda, D. Guenot, P. Johnsson, J. Caillat, J. Mauritsson, A. Maquet, R. Taieb, and A. LHuillier, Probing single-photon ionization on the attosecond time scale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 143002 (2011).
  224. J. M. Dahlström, A. L'Huillier, and A. Maquet, Introduction to attosecond delays in photoionization, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 45, 183001 (2012).
  225. M. Isinger et al., Photoionization in the time and frequency domain, Science 358, 893 (2017).
  226. L. Cattaneo et al., Comparison of attosecond streaking and RABBITT, Opt. Express 24, 29060 (2016).
  227. M. Huppert, I. Jordan, D. Baykusheva, A. von Conta, and H. J. Worner, Attosecond delays in molecular photoionization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 093001 (2016).
  228. A. Chacon, M. Lein, and C. Ruiz, Asymmetry of Wigner's time delay in a small molecule, Phys. Rev. A 89, 053427 (2014).
  229. J. Vos et al., Orientation-dependent stereo Wigner time delay and electron localization in a small molecule, Science 360, 1326 (2018).
  230. S. Biswas et al., Probing molecular environment through photoemission delays, Nat. Phys. 16, 778 (2020).
  231. S. Beaulieu et al., Attosecond-resolved photoionization of chiral molecules, Science 358, 1288 (2017).
  232. H. Ahmadi et al., Attosecond photoionisation time delays reveal the anisotropy of the molecular potential in the recoil frame, Nat. Commun. 13, 1242 (2022).
  233. A. J. Suñer-Rubio et al., Attosecond photoionization delays in molecules: The role of nuclear motion, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L022066 (2024).
  234. V. Loriot et al., Attosecond metrology of the two-dimensional charge distribution in molecules, Nat. Phys. 20, 765 (2024).
  235. I. Jordan et al., Attosecond spectroscopy of liquid water, Science 369, 974 (2020).
  236. A. L. Cavalieri et al., Attosecond spectroscopy in condensed matter, Nature (London) 449, 1029 (2007).
  237. R. Locher et al., Energy-dependent photoemission delays from noble metal surfaces by attosecond interferometry, Optica 2, 405 (2015).
  238. M. Ossiander et al., Absolute timing of the photoelectric effect, Nature (London) 561, 374 (2018).
  239. M. Lucchini et al., Light-matter interaction at surfaces in the spatiotemporal limit of macroscopic models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 137401 (2015).
  240. U. Fano, Sullo spettro di assorbimento dei gas nobili presso il limite dello spettro d'arco, Nuovo Cimento 12, 154 (1935).
  241. U. Fano, Effects of configuration interaction on intensities and phase shifts, Phys. Rev. 124, 1866 (1961).
  242. M. Kotur et al., Spectral phase measurement of a Fano resonance using tunable attosecond pulses, Nat. Commun. 7, 10566 (2016).
  243. C. Cirelli et al., Anisotropic photoemission time delays close to a Fano resonance, Nat. Commun. 9, 955 (2018).
  244. M. Wickenhauser, J. Burgdörfer, F. Krausz, and M. Drescher, Time resolved Fano resonances, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 023002 (2005).
  245. R. Borrego-Varillas and M. Lucchini, Reconstruction of atomic resonances with attosecond streaking, Opt. Express 29, 9711 (2021).
  246. V. Gruson et al., Attosecond dynamics through a Fano resonance: Monitoring the birth of a photoelectron, Science 354, 734 (2016).
  247. H. W. Kroto et al., C60: Buckminsterfullerene, Nature (London) 318, 162 (1985).
  248. I. V. Hertel, H. Steger, J. de Vries, B. Weisser, C. Menzel, B. Kamke, and W. Kamke, Giant plasmon excitation in free C60 and C70 molecules studied by photoionization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 784 (1992).
  249. S. Biswas et al., Correlation-driven attosecond photoemission delay in the plasmonic excitation of C60 fullerene, Sci. Adv. 11, eads0494 (2025).
  250. M. Drescher et al., Time-resolved atomic inner-shell spectroscopy, Nature (London) 419, 803 (2002).
  251. M. Ossiander et al., Attosecond correlation dynamics, Nat. Phys. 13, 280 (2017).
  252. S. Li et al., Attosecond coherent electron motion in Auger-Meitner decay, Science 375, 285 (2022).
  253. L. S. Cederbaum et al., Ultrafast charge migration by electron correlation, Chem. Phys. Lett. 307, 205 (1999).
  254. V. Despré, N. V. Golubev, and A. I. Kuleff, Charge migration in propiolic acid: A full quantum dynamical study, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 203002 (2018).
  255. M. Vacher, L. Steinberg, A. J. Jenkins, M. J. Bearpark, and M. A. Robb, Electron dynamics following photoionization: Decoherence due to the nuclear-wave-packet width, Phys. Rev. A 92, 040502(R) (2015).
  256. M. Vacher et al., Communication: Oscillating charge migration between lone pairs persists without significant interaction with nuclear motion in the glycine and Gly-Gly-NH-CH3 radical cations, J. Chem. Phys. 140, 201102 (2014).
  257. M. Lara-Astiaso et al., Decoherence, control and attosecond probing of XUV-induced charge migration in biomolecules. A theoretical outlook, Faraday Discuss. 194, 41 (2016).
  258. A. S. Folorunso et al., Attochemistry regulation of charge migration, J. Phys. Chem. A 127, 1894 (2023).
  259. J. Breidbach and L. S. Cederbaum, Universal attosecond response to the removal of an electron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 033901 (2005).
  260. F. Remacle and R. D. Levine, An electronic time scale in chemistry, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 6793 (2006).
  261. A. I. Kuleff and L. S. Cederbaum, Ultrafast correlation-driven electron dynamics, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 47, 124002 (2014).
  262. F. Calegari et al., Ultrafast electron dynamics in phenylalanine initiated by attosecond pulses, Science 346, 336 (2014).
  263. M. Lara-Astiaso et al., Attosecond pump–probe spectroscopy of charge dynamics in tryptophan, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 4570 (2018).
  264. E. P. Månsson et al., Real-time observation of a correlation-driven sub 3 fs charge migration in ionised adenine, Commun. Chem. 4, 73 (2021).
  265. E. P. Månsson et al., Ultrafast dynamics of adenine following XUV ionization, J. Phys. Photonics 4, 034003 (2022).
  266. D. Schwickert et al., Charge-induced chemical dynamics in glycine probed with time-resolved auger electron spectroscopy, Struct. Dyn 9, 064301 (2022).
  267. P. M. Kraus et al., Measurement and laser control of attosecond charge migration in ionized iodoacetylene, Science 350 790 (2015).
  268. D. T. Matselyukh et al., Decoherence and revival in attosecond charge migration driven by non-adiabatic dynamics, Nat. Phys. 18, 1206 (2022).
  269. V. Wanie et al., Capturing electron-driven chiral dynamics in UV-excited molecules, Nature (London) 630, 109 (2024).
  270. O. Kühn and V. May, Charge and Energy Transfer Dynamics in Molecular Systems (WileyHoboken, NJ, 2023).
  271. J. Gunst, Y. A. Litvinov, C. H. Keitel, and A. Pálffy, Dominant secondary nuclear photoexcitation with the x-ray free-electron laser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 082501 (2014).
  272. Y. Wu, J. Gunst, C. H. Keitel, and A. Pálffy, Tailoring laser-generated plasmas for efficient nuclear excitation by electron capture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 052504 (2018).
  273. F. Salvat and J. Parellada, Theory of conversion electron Mössbauer spectroscopy (CEMS), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 1, 70 (1984).
  274. A. Pálffy, W. Scheid, and Z. Harman, Theory of nuclear excitation by electron capture for heavy ions, Phys. Rev. A 73, 012715 (2006).
  275. A. Pálffy, J. Evers, and C. H. Keitel, Isomer triggering via nuclear excitation by electron capture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 172502 (2007).
  276. J. Baró, J. Sempau, J. Fernández-Varea, and F. Salvat, PENELOPE: An algorithm for Monte Carlo simulation of the penetration and energy loss of electrons and positrons in matter, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 100, 31 (1995).
  277. A. V. K. Nomura and Y. Ujihira, Applications of conversion electron Mössbauer spectrometry (CEMS), J. Radiol. Nucl. Chem. 202, 103 (1996).
  278. Y. Wu, S. Gargiulo, F. Carbone, C. H. Keitel, and A. Pálffy, Dynamical control of nuclear isomer depletion via electron vortex beams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 162501 (2022).
  279. T. Spillane et al., C12+C12 Fusion reactions near the Gamow energy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 122501 (2007).
  280. A. Pálffy et al., Nuclear excitation by electron capture followed by fast x-ray emission, Phys. Lett. B 661, 330 (2008).
  281. Z. Bonchev, A. Jordanov, and A. Minkova, Method of analysis of thin surface layers by the Mössbauer effect, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 70, 36 (1969).
  282. K. R. Swanson and J. J. Spijkerman, Analysis of thin surface layers by Fe‐57 Mössbauer backscattering spectrometry, J. Appl. Phys. 41, 3155 (1970).
  283. J. R. Gancedo, M. Gracia, and J. F. Marco, Cems methodology, Hyperfine Interact. 66, 83 (1991).
  284. J. J. Spijkerman, in Mössbauer Effect Methodology, edited by I. J. Gruvennan (Plenum, New York, 1971), p. 85.
  285. M. J. Tricker, in Mössbauer Spectroscopy and its Chemical Spplications, edited by J. G. Stevens and G. K. Shenoy (ACSWashington, DC, 1981).
  286. J. Sawicki and B. Sawicka, Experimental techniques for conversion electron Mössbauer spectroscopy, Hyperfine Interact. 13, 199 (1983).
  287. W. Meisel, Phase analysis of surface layers by Mössbauer spectroscopy, Spectrochim. Acta Part B: Atom. Spectrosc. 39, 1505 (1984).
  288. M. Inaba, K. Nomura, and Y. Ujihara, Sensitive area of a back-scatter-type gas flow detector for conversion electron Mössbauer spectrometry, J. Phys. Colloques 41, C1-115 (1980).
  289. K. Nomura, M. Tasaka, and Y. Ujihira, Application of conversion electron Mössbauer spectrometry to corrosion studies, Corrosion 44, 131 (1988).
  290. K. Nomura and Y. Ujihira, Applications of the Mössbauer Effect (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1985), pp. 1185–1192.
  291. K. Nomura and Y. Ujihira, Analysis of black layers on steel using conversion electron Mössbauer spectrometry, J. Mater. Sci. 19, 2664 (1984).
  292. P. Refait, P. Bauer, and J. M. R. Genin, The transformation of green rust one into fe(II)-fe(III) hydroxides — fe(II)-fe(III) oxyhydroxides by oxidation, Hyperfine Interact. 69, 831 (1992).
  293. J. Lipka et al., Mössbauer study of amorphous and nanocrystalline fe-cu-nb-si-b alloys, Hyperfine Interact. 57, 1969 (1990).
  294. N. R. Bulakh et al., Mössbauer studies of fe-doped sno2 semiconducting oxide, Hyperfine Interact. 41, 641 (1988).
  295. W. Meisel, Mössbauer spectroscopy of corrosion products, Hyperfine Interact. 45, 73 (1989).
  296. J. Davalos et al., Mössbauer study of the thermal decomposition of goethite, Hyperfine Interact. 57, 1809 (1990).
  297. J. S. Brooks and S. Thorpe, The characterisation of iron-containing intermetallic phases within the surface region of an aluminium alloy, Hyperfine Interact. 47–48, 159 (1989).
  298. F. J. Berry, A conversion electron Mössbauer investigation of the phosphating of iron surfaces, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 11, 1736 (2011).
  299. K. Nomura, Y. Ujihira, and R. Kojima, Mössbauer study of corrosion products formed on iron surfaces in aqueous solutions, in Proceedings of Indian National Science Academy (Indian National Science Academy, New Delhi, 1982), pp. 311–316.
  300. K. Nomura and Y. Ujihira, Studies on the formation and thermal properties of manganese phosphate coatings and hureaulite by means of conversion electron and transmission Mössbauer spectrometry, J. Mater. Sci. 17, 3437 (1982).
  301. M. Carbucicchio, G. Palombarini, and G. Sambogna, Mössbauer study of the corrosion products on iron surfaces, Hyperfine Interact. 57, 1775 (1990).
  302. K. Nomura and Y. Ujihira, Mössbauer spectroscopic study of iron oxides formed by pyrolysis of iron(iii) complexes, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 5, 221 (1983).
  303. E. Matijević and J. Danon, Formation of uniform spherical iron oxides by hydrolysis of Fe(III) salts, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 39, 569 (1977).
  304. M. J. Tricker, L. A. Ash, and W. Jones, On the anomalous inertness to oxidation of the surface regions of vivianite: A Fe57 conversion electron and transmission Mössbauer study, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 41, 891 (1979).
  305. D. Hanzel, W. Meisel, and P. Götlich, Mössbauer study of iron compounds under high pressure, Hyperfine Interact. 57, 2201 (1990).
  306. D. Hanzel, W. Meisel, D. Hanzel, and P. Gütlich, Mössbauer effect study of the oxidation of vivianite, Solid State Commun. 76, 307 (1990).
  307. K. Nomura and Y. Ujihira, Analysis of oxalate coating on steels by conversion electron Mössbauer spectrometry, J. Mater. Sci. 18, 1751 (1983).
  308. M. Inaba, K. Nomura, and Y. Ujihira, Changes of lattice parameter and internal magnetic field by impurity surface enrichment phenomena on Fe-36 Ni, J. Jpn. Inst. Met. 52, 1121 (1988).
  309. M. Inaba, K. Nomura, and Y. Ujihira, Mössbauer spectra of chromium added Fe-36 Ni, J. Jpn. Inst. Met. 53, 356 (1989).
  310. G. Fratucello, E. Colombo, O. Donzelli, and F. Ronconi, Study of the Fe-Ni interface by conversion electron Mössbauer spectroscopy, Hyperfine Interact. 45, 255 (1989).
  311. M. Ghafari et al., Magnetic studies of the new soft magnetic Fe-Ni-Cr alloys, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 76, 37 (1993).
  312. K. Morimoto, A. Kirihigashi, and S. Nasu, Backscattering Mössbauer measurements of microstructural change in annealed duplex stainless steel, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 76, 295 (1993).
  313. B. Boubeker, J. Eymery, M. Denanot, and E. Sayouty, A TEM and CEMS study of bcc Fe-Ni-Cr thin films, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 133, 470 (1994).
  314. J. Korecki and U. Gradmann, In situ Mössbauer analysis of hyperfine interactions near Fe(110) surfaces and interfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2491 (1985).
  315. F. Volkening, B. Jonker, J. Krebs, N. Koon, and G. Prinz, Hyperfine fields and spin orientations in (Fe57/Ag) superlattices from conversion electron Mössbauer studies, J. Appl. Phys. 63, 3869 (1988).
  316. F. Volkening et al., Magnetic relaxation effects in Fe57, J. Phys. Colloq. 49, C8 (1988).
  317. J. Korecki and U. Gradmann, In-situ conversion electron Mössbauer spectroscopy on Fe(110)-surfaces and thin films, Hyperfine Interact. 28, 931 (1986).
  318. J. Korecki, M. Przybylski, and U. Gradmann, Thermal variation and spatial distribution of local magnetization in ultrathin Fe(110) films, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 89, 325 (1990).
  319. J. Korecki and U. Gradmann, Spatial oscillation of magnetic hyperfine field near the free Fe(110)-surface, Europhys. Lett. 2, 651 (1986).
  320. G. Liu and U. Gradmann, Magnetic order near Fe(100) interfaces from Mössbauer spectroscopy, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 118, 99 (1993).
  321. W. A. A. Macedo and W. Keune, Magnetism of epitaxial fcc-Fe(100) films on Cu(100) investigated in Situ by conversion-electron Mössbauer spectroscopy in ultrahigh vacuum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 475 (1988).
  322. O. Donzelli, G. Fratucello, F. Ronconi, J. Tejada, Z. Rachid, and X. Zhang, Magnetic properties of (111) Cu/Fe multilayers, Hyperfine Interact. 68, 303 (1992).
  323. J. Landes et al., Magnetic hyperfine fields near the Fe/Cr (100, 110) interface studied by CEMS, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 86, 71 (1990).
  324. J. Landes et al., CEMS-study of the interface in Fe/Cr multilayer systems, Hyperfine Interact. 57, 1941 (1990).
  325. W. Sturhahn, Nuclear resonant spectroscopy, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16, S497 (2004).
  326. B. W. Adams et al., X-ray quantum optics, J. Mod. Opt. 60, 2 (2013).
  327. E. E. Alp, T. M. Mooney, T. Toellner, W. Sturhahn, E. Witthoff, R. Rohlsberger, E. Gerdau, H. Homma, and M. Kentjana, Time resolved nuclear resonant scattering from Sn119 nuclei using synchrotron radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3351 (1993).
  328. R. Röhlsberger, J. Bansmann, V. Senz, K. L. Jonas, A. Bettac, K. H. Meiwes-Broer, and O. Leupold, Nanoscale magnetism probed by nuclear resonant scattering of synchrotron radiation, Phys. Rev. B 67, 245412 (2003).
  329. K. Heeg, A. Kaldun, C. Strohm et al., Coherent x-ray-optical control of nuclear excitons, Nature (London) 590, 401 (2021).
  330. F. Schaden et al., Laser-induced quenching of the Th-229 nuclear clock isomer in calcium fluoride, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, L022036 (2025).
  331. E. V. Tkalya, Features of coherent excitation of 229mth, Nucl. Phys. A 1022, 122428 (2022).
  332. F. F. Karpeshin, Laser assisted two-photon electron-nucleus resonance as applied to producing the 229mth isomer, Phys. Rev. C 110, 054307 (2024).
  333. F. Karpeshin and M. Trzhaskovskaya, Impact of the ionization of the atomic shell on the lifetime of the 229mth isomer, Nucl. Phys. A 969, 173 (2018).
  334. F. Karpeshin, Electron shell as a resonator, Hyperfine Interact. 143, 79 (2002).
  335. A. Coc, P. Descouvemont, K. A. Olive, J. P. Uzan, and E. Vangioni, Variation of fundamental constants and the role of A=5 and A=8 nuclei on primordial nucleosynthesis, Phys. Rev. D 86, 043529 (2012).
  336. M. Thoennessen, Reaching the limits of nuclear stability, Rep. Prog. Phys. 67, 1187 (2004).
  337. M. Thoennessen, The Discovery of Isotopes (Springer, Switzerland, 2016).
  338. R. Röhlsberger et al., Phonon damping in thin films of Fe, J. Appl. Phys. 86, 584 (1999).
  339. S. Hu, B. Zhang, J. Xue, and H. Pang, Lattice dynamics and enhanced electron–phonon coupling of itinerant magnet Fe1−xCoxSi (x ≥ 0.3): A Fe57 Mössbauer spectroscopy study, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 593, 171842 (2024).
  340. S. Lohaus, M. Heine, P. Guzman et al., A thermodynamic explanation of the Invar effect, Nat. Phys. 19, 1642 (2023).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. A 112, 040101– Published 8 October, 2025
  • Received 4 April 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation